Thursday, October 7, 2010

Don Pulls Up The Welcome Mat

Attn American Power readers: (A quick addition/update, by repsac3, 10/9/10): No, we don't know what Donald Douglas thinks he's doing by linking repeatedly to this American Nihilist article either, but this post here is about Dr. Douglas misquoting Imam Rauf, and his obvious and unhinged "displeasure" at getting called on it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's all the attention you get, Unthinking Freak. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200. Like Reppy, exDLB, Bonejob Keefe, Truth 101 and the rest you commie refuse. Stay the hell away from this blog. You are the scum of the earth.

No. There, that’s out of the way. On to the rest of the post which he attacks nihilist troll Thinking Meat. TM says at his blog:

I was right, of course. You don't have the guts to post Rauf's actual words.
No, much much easier to 'paraphrase' them, so that you can portray him as 'saying' anything you need him to 'say'.

So Don does his best O’Reilly with:

And fuck you --- Unthinking Commie Pinhead. Here's Imam Rauf's exact words:

"We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non-Muslims. You may remember that the US-led sanctions against Iraq led to the death of over half a million Iraqi children."

And does Don do anything to counter this accusation? No. The crime perpetrated on the United States on 9/11 was heinous. Over 3000 US citizens and others lost their lives. The sanctions put in place and kept in place during the Bush I and Clinton administrations did lead to the deaths of over a half million Iraqi children. That was one of the reasons given by bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks. Rauf does not say the 9/11 attacks were justified. What he’s saying is no different than what Chalmers Johnson, Andrew Bacevich and many other conservatives have said. The attacks were blowback.

Don goes on to say of the imam:

As for sharia, the Imam published a call for sharia in America at Huffington Post last year: "What Shariah Law Is All About."

If anyone, and that includes you Don, can point out to me in that article where Rauf “publishes a call for Sharia” in the US I’ll give him a hundred bucks. The title of the piece pretty much sums up what it’s about as do the last few sentences:

Rather than fear Shariah law, we should understand what it actually is. Then we can encourage Muslim countries to make the changes that achieve the essence of fairness and justice that are at the root of Islam.

Words mean stuff Don. And you know you really love the attention you get from your nihilist anarchist fans.

ADDENDUM:

'Muslims do not hate our freedom, but rather they hate our policies [the report says]. The overwhelming majority voice their objections to what they see as one-sided support in favor of Israel and against Palestinian rights, and the long-standing, even increasing, support for what Muslims collectively see as tyrannies, most notably Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan and the Gulf states. Thus, when American public diplomacy talks about bringing democracy to Islamic societies, this is seen as no more than self-serving hypocrisy.' 

But, of course Ron Paul is not a conservative because he hates America as much as we nihilist/anarchists do.

60 comments:

thepalescot said...

i figured it out; Don is the anti-johnny Winters;

By all figuring John should be an accordion playing polka junkie, but life intervened.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Tyg5SJDpiQ

Donald Douglas said...

Well, I've updated my post, to acknowledge my initial mistake. My bad: 'Imam Rauf's Islamist Extremism --- UPDATED!!'.

But thanks exDLB for demonstrating your anti-Americanism for all to see. We deserved it, okay? That's why Americans, myself included, have repudiated the Democrat-Socialist Party.

And I'm also glad you responded, since now we can pinpoint who sent The Pale Scot over to Bonejob Keefe's. Or, perhaps one of your readers was moved to adopt the moniker for himself. Either way, it just proves the point: American Nihilist is a racist hate site. Nothing you people have to say deserves dignity or respect. You have to right to spew all your lies and hatred, and good thing too: "By their fruits ye shall know them..."

thepalescot said...

Get a grip Don:
http://americannihilistblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/pale-scot-affair.html

And I'm not liberal, that your surname is taken from your family's slaveowner is sad. I would use Icelandic system and use (your father's name)son. The slaveholders were Cavaliers, aristocrats who opposed Parliamentary power and lost the English Civil War. They ended up moving into their holdings in the American South where they created a society where the lower classes knew their place. And they populated the country with lowland scots, the same people England shipped to Ireland to suppress rebellion, and who are exemplified by the memory of Ian Paisley standing next to Catholic civil rights marchers in the 60's, screaming that they're advocating violence. Bigotry runs in their blood.

The Douglas joined with Robert the Bruce and fought for Scottish independence, but the clan got wealthy and became English suckups, fighting with the royalists and later against Bonnie Prince Charles.

But Donald, that's history, and you're more than welcome at a Highland/Irish Fest, sip some Poitin Stil, put on a kilt and toss a caber. And I let you in on a secret, the Irish invented the bagpipes and gave them to the Scots as a joke.
The Scots still haven't gotten it.

Donald Douglas said...

Pale Scot: I have no idea who you are, but you've revealed yourself, to the racist core, for all to see. If you thought your ideas were so wonderful and mainstream, you'd post under your real name for all to see.

Kevin Robbins said...

Don, so nice of you to visit. Please don't be quoting scripture over here, though. It burns, yessss, it burns.

As to your update, you are still saying that Rauf is praising Sharia which he is not really doing in the piece. It seems just explanatory to me, but maybe that's why you don't quote any of it. And maybe you should wake up before you post.

Also not sure where I said we deserved the 9/11 attacks. I did note one reason given by bin Laden for the attacks. The others were our unflinching support of Israel (yes go ahead, I'm an anti-Semite, too) and our bases in Saudi Arabia. Do you deny that the sanctions led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands in Iraq? C'mon dude, you can jump on Bill Clinton for that.

Does it really do us a lot of good to deny reality? We, as a nation, have some warts.

You can count right? That makes Rauf's statement true that more Muslims died as a result of our actions than died on 9/11. The attacks on 9/11 were heinous. The sanctions were as well.

As to the US public repudiating the Democratic party, we'll see.

And thanks for the history, Pale Scot. I've known a few Welshmen who played the pipes. They weren't in on the joke either. I've been to a few military tattoos at Fort Ticonderoga. Is that a Scottish thing? I'm sure you know of Duncan Campbell.

thepalescot said...

Your right, I am a bigot down to the core, I hate judgmental cracker prods, and that you, son of black man (and I'm going to use that 'cause as a good friend's mom said. "they've called me N**, negro, black, Afro-American etc and i'm tired and sticking with black") seems to want to pal around with what should be your mortal enemy appalls me. We don't get to chose our parents but we do get to choose our ideas.

And I don't give a shit about what people think, unless they're Irish or Polish Catholic.

And it's fucking hysterical that your grasping at being anti-communist. You know less than 0. My mum's family is Polish, and I use to pull my grandma's cart around JC collecting used clothes to send to families there. Both of my ancestral countries were under foreign occupation. I grew thinking the only thing prods, ruskies and krauts were good for was killing. But I grew up. It seems the only people dumber than poly-sci's are economists. "The market is rational" is right up there with "Democrats are commies".

Old Polish Joke;
A German and a Russian are charging you and you have only one bullet left, who do you shoot? The Russian, it's business before pleasure.

KR, The Welsh are solid people, good bowman and solid pikemen, and smart enough to avoid service in the UK military, unlike the Irish and the Highlanders.

PS. Yes, Irish and Poles hold grudges for a very long time

thepalescot said...

The trumpet player, the historian, or the preacher, there's a lot of Campbells around.

But I'm a big fan of Andy Stewart;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dn32iyvqJn0

Rambin' Rover
Oh, there're sober men in plenty,
And drunkards barely twenty,
There are men of over ninety
That have never yet kissed a girl.
But gie me a ramblin' rover,
And fae Orkney down to Dover.
We will roam the country over
And together we'll face the world.

There's many that feign enjoyment
From merciless employment,
Their ambition was this deployment
From the minute they left the school.
And they save and scrape and ponder
While the rest go out and squander,
See the world and rove and wander
And are happier as a rule.

I've roamed through all the nations
Ta'en delight in all creation,
And I've tried a wee sensation

[ From: http://www.metrolyrics.com/the-ramblin-rover-lyrics-andy-m-stewart.html ]

Where the company, did prove kind.
And when partin' was no pleasure,
I've drunk another measure
To the good friends that were treasure
For they always are in our minds.

If you're bent wi' arth-i-ritis,
Your bowels have got colitis,
You've gallopin' with bollockitis
And you're thinkin' it's time you died,
If you been a man of action,
Though you're lying there in traction,
You will get some satisfaction
Thinkin', "Jesus, at least I tried."

thepalescot said...

& The Wolfetones rock

Twas down the glen one Easter morn
To a city fair rode I.
When armed line of marching men
In squadrons passed me by.
No pipes did hum, no battle drum
Did sound its loud tattoo
But the Angelus bell o'er the Liffey's swell
Rang out in the foggy dew.

Right proudly high over Dublin town
They hung out a flag of war.

!!'Twas better to die 'neath an Irish sky
Than at Suvla or Sud el Bar.!!

And from the plains of Royal Meath
Strong men came hurrying through;
While Brittania's huns with their great big guns
Sailed in through the foggy dew.

O' the night fell black and the rifles' crack
Made "Perfidious Abion" reel
'Mid the leaden rail, seven tongues of flame
Did shine o'er the lines of steel.
By each shining blade a prayer was siad
That to Ireland her sons be true,
And when morning broke still the war flag shook
Out its fold in the foggy dew

'Twas England bade our wild geese go
That small nations might be free.
But their lonely graves are by Suvla's waves
On the fringe of the gray North Sea.
But had they died by Pearse's side
Or fought with Cathal Brugha,
Their names we'd keep where the Fenians sleep
'Neath the shroud of the foggy dew.

The bravest fell, and the solemn bell
Rang mournfully and clear
For those who died that Watertide
In the springing of the year.
And the world did gaze with deep amaze
At those fearless men, but few
Who bore the fight that freedom's light
Might shine through the foggy dew.

Ah, back through the glen I rode again
and my heart with grief was sore
For I parted then with valiant men
whom I never shall see more.
But to and fro in my dreams I go and
I'd kneel and pray for you,
For slavery fled, O glorious dead, when
you fell in the foggy dew.

Donald Douglas said...

exDLB: You're an America-basher, as explained at my linked post. I made a correction at my place. You have both corrections and apologies to make. I am genuinely blown away that you'd welcome Pale Scot to your blog rather than denounce him. And you yourself denied that YOU were Pale Scot at one point. Now you befriend him. Typical of your hatred of those with whom you disagree. Proves it though: This place is a refuge for racists and demons.

Pale Scot: You feign knowledge poorly. At two posts you have focused on my ethnic background while making personal slurs against me. exDLB is down with it, obviously, as he praises you for your "historical" acumen. Pulling a cart gives you no clue to leftist ideology, obviously, since the end point of "equality" is always the same: the terror. But of course, you're "not a liberal," which explains why you work so hard to defend that bankrupt ideology. Come out from your pseudonym, either way. If you're so proud of the hatred you spout, then no need to be shy about it.

thepalescot said...

Say good night Gracy

This has to be a con,

Have a nice life ya'll, I'm going back to the market blogs where the IQ is above room Temp.

AYATOLLAH TRUTHMENI 101 said...

Why am I being banned again? All I did was offer to get stoned with Don.

I don't know who PaleScot is either. But I did sell a bunch of GE today and made a boatload of money which I only have to pay capital gains taxes on. Damn pinko commie that I am. Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ...

Still thinking about voting for Meg "eliminate useless political science professors" Whitman Don?

She wants to ban unions and tenure also. You do still support your union, don't you Don?

Kevin Robbins said...

I am genuinely blown away that you'd welcome Pale Scot to your blog rather than denounce him. And you yourself denied that YOU were Pale Scot at one point. Now you befriend him. Typical of your hatred of those with whom you disagree.

Don, we even welcome you here and we think you're a bigger racist (as well as a warmonger). And why wouldn't I have denied (3 times before the rooster crows if you want me to get biblical) that I was him, as I am not. I am Welsh and French for the record. As for befriending him, hey I'm a friendly guy. I don't have hatred for you for that matter. I think you need help. I hope there are people close to you who can stage an intervention. Soon!

As to: You're an America-basher, as explained at my linked post. I made a correction at my place. You have both corrections and apologies to make.

To-may-toh, to-mah-toh. You want to call it America bashing. I prefer to think that I am pointing out areas where we could do better like not killing thousands of people in other countries. As you've pointed out before I am pretty stupid so you'll have to show me exactly where I need to make corrections and what to apologize for.

Pale Scot, as far as I'm concerned stop by anytime. The Nihilist Ale is always on tap. You too, Don. Reppy is our bouncer, er Chief Nihilist, so it's really up to him, though. We serve at his pleasure. As for me. I'm going to serve myself a Yuengling right now. Peace out!

Kevin Robbins said...

Ayatollah, I hooe you're sending a big chunk of change to Meg's campaign. You know Jerry Brown is down with useless curriculums like PoliSci and Sociology and all that crap. Can't compete in the world teaching that.

I think Don may be a self-hating union member.

Donald Douglas said...

"...we think you're a bigger racist."

Whoa. A bigger than Pale Scot? Who argued that I wasn't a real Scot or a real American, for that matter. That's racism, of the most vile kind. But of course, you attack me as racist. You people are sickening. Not a shred of decency. You embrace the hate and defend it by alleging others are even more racist.

At one time you denounced that stuff. Racism. Racism. Racism. Everyone's calling racism. Then when you one of your people attacks your opponents with the most vile statements of racial supremacy, you're down with it. American Nihilist is a hate site, as I've said all the time. All you do is laugh about it. No values, whatsoever. Shame on you.

Donald Douglas said...

I'm expecting an apology and correction to this post.

As I wrote today: "The Pale Scot at American Nihilist."

"There's a difference between being "politically incorrect" and being "racist." I'm often very "politically incorrect," but never racist. Leftists uniformly attack "political correctness" as "racism," but they rarely --- if ever --- denounce the genuine racist white supremacism within their own ranks.

I think the folks at American Nihilist owe me an apology."
.

If you lefties are so much better than conservatives, you'll denounce the hatred and white supremacists attacks, and you'll update this blog with the corrected information from my post, which has been updated, linked at top. If not, then STFU. You've got no moral creds, whatsoever.

repsac3 said...

My oh my... Go off for the day, and big doings when I return...

I'll get to the bullshit by and by, but first...

BIG Andy Stewart fan, PScot... My introduction was accidentally catching a good bit of a live radio performance on audio tape back in the 80s, and spending years trying to find out who this was I was diggin' so much... (Pre-internet, obviously...) I'd bring the tape to record stores and play it for 'em, call into celtic music shows and try to quote lyrics, and do everything else I could think of to find out who he was... Had no luck until the web got going enough to answer my queries...

These were some of the tunes that I first heard and loved:

YouTube - Andy M. Stewart & Manus Lunny - Dinny The Piper / Amhran Na Tae

YouTube - If You're Going to Love a Woman

YouTube - Andy M Stewart and Gerry O'Beirne - The Humours of Whiskey

The last was Tak It, Man, Tak It Alas, I can find no audio or video for this one...

But I did see this one... Perhaps it's kind of a transition piece...: YouTube - ANDY STEWART DONALD WHERES YER TROOSERS 8>)

Donald Douglas said...

"I'll get to the bullshit by and by..."

No BS. AmNi is a white supremacist backing hate site. I've said it all along. RepMasterRace3!!

And you're total fail on lefist ideology at previous posts, which I've ignored, but hey, since I'm on a streak:

""Social anarchism, collectivist anarchism, anarcho-syndicalism, Luxemburgism, Left communism, Council communism, Maoism, Leninism, Trotskyism, and more general revolutionary socialism are all examples of radical-left political ideologies." 'Here.

repsac3 said...

What is the bug up trouserless Donald's ass this day?

Donalde my friend, I fear you're talking out of your ass, again.

No one here thinks we deserved anything that happened on 9/11, and neither does Imam Rauf. Many believe that blowback is real, however. Actions have consequences. Things America does cause other nations or people to respond, sometimes in ways that are horrific and immoral.

That doesn't necessarily mean we shouldn't take any action that they could react horrifically to, but it does mean that we ought to take the possibility into account before acting, and not deny that our action may well have precipitated their action, after the fact.

It's not blame; it's an accurate accounting of history.

Next: Racism and Pale Scott.

Again, you're being a moron. The guy found us after the fact, as a result of a post done here with his screen name on it, about your cries of raaaaacism!!. No one "sent" him anywhere but him.

He doesn't seem to be offering anything in the way of racial/white supremacy, that I can see... He said you were kinda dark for a guy with so celtic a name. There is no supremacy in that. There just isn't. You're just being a drama queen. I mean, answer this question: Are you, in fact, a real Scot? (I'm not, and I don't feel the slightest bit inferior about it. I don't understand why you would.) ((He does seem to have a bit of pride about being a Scot, but that's no different--and no more bigoted--than guys who go around with "Some of us were lucky enough to be born Italian" t-shirts. Pride for one's own heritage is not racism, Don. Really.))

Should he say anything bigoted while here, I'll reply to it, the same way I do when I believe you have said bigoted things. So far, it hasn't happened, though.

You can certainly whine and moan about this being a racist hate site, with no dignity or respect if you wish, but eventually, you're going to have to point to specifics for folks to take you seriously. Shold you ever do that, I'll be glad to discuss it with you. These generalized, vague accusations however, are meaningless.

As for you and your suggestion that you're not racist, but only politically incorrect, all I can say is we've each made our cases, and I assume we're each stickin' by them. People who read our words on the subject will decide for themselves, and all the protestations about how right one of us is and how wrong the other one is probably isn't going to change all that many minds, so you'll forgive me if I don't bother engaging in it.

Real Name: Give it a dang rest. If you' can't handle the fact that there are folks spread all along the political spectrum who use regular nom de' keyboards online by now, you really ought to leave the internet. Folks without obvious "real names" post comments at your blog and others you frequent all the time. Either be intellectually consistent and demand real names from everybody, or admit that pseudonymity online is acceptable. You can't have it both ways, Donalde. Make up your mind.

I think that's the bulk of it... If anyone feels I missed anything, lemmie know. Otherwise, have a lovely evening, all...

Donald Douglas said...

From Pale Scot:

"Don is the anti-johnny Winters..."

Well, since Johnny Winters is albino that'd make me blacker than a barrel of black crude, but of course it's just a coincidence that the color of my skin had to be mentioned by The Pale Scot, who doesn't think I should be Scot, much less American. Or did you forget about your defense of Pale Scot at Bonejob Keefe's, who, by the way, considered the comments deliciously disgusting, a pefert attack on D.D. allowing plausible deniability?

Just as good here for you as well. And you've been attacking me as RAAAAACIST all week. Hypocrite much. All of you race-master hate-mongers. Democrat Party backers, so it figures.

I'm expecting an apology and a correction to exDLB post falsely attacking my entry, linked above.

Haters all of you.

repsac3 said...

You say alot, Donalde... Unfortunately, you fail to back much of it with actual quotes or examples...

Sadly, nothing changes...

Let me know if you're ever ready to have a real conversation, Dr Douglas...

Donald Douglas said...

The point is adequate without quotes, RepMasterRaceHateMonger.

But you did not denounce the hateful comments at Bonejobs, although that was a perfect chance. And you have not denounced Pale Scot in this thread. Perhaps tomorrow you will clarify your stand, for example, that AmNi is indeed a free-speech zone for fever swamp white supremacism:

"Donalde... You don't feel the slightest little bit like you're playing the victim card, here?

The fact is, not everyone runs their blog the way you run yours. Where you choose to moderate comments for content and keep who knows how much from seeing the light of day, based on whatever criteria you feel proper, others choose to treat people like adults, and to post whatever they want. We know THEY are responsible for their words, and THEY deserve whatever credit or recrimination folks choose to heap on 'em, based on what they say ...

Your guilt by association meme is bullshit, and I think you know it. I am no more responsible for the words someone else writes in one of my comment sections than my pet cat is. Holding bloggers responsible for every word that come out of the keyboard of any commenter on their blog is just stupid, and I can't speak for Brendan, but I reject it completely."


Pale Scot is in your house now, making crude racialist slurs. Victim card? I think not.

And you offer, and have offered, a spineless cop out that I would never match, as I have long shown the kind moral clarity that you obviously lack.

You only care if allegedly "racist" speech is uttered by conservatives. If said speech might possibly harm your opponents, you be down wid dat!!

repsac3 said...

The point is adequate without quotes

Without quotes, you're making no point... just empty allegations.

But you did not denounce the hateful comments at Bonejobs, although that was a perfect chance. And you have not denounced Pale Scot in this thread.

No, I haven't. I don't believe he said anything bigoted, and that's what I've said since the first time you whined about his words. (On the positive side, you did at least point to the words you believed to be a slur... I was impressed by that, at least.)

Perhaps tomorrow you will clarify your stand, for example, that AmNi is indeed a free-speech zone for fever swamp white supremacism

This blog is a free speech zone, period. I only delete spam. Any other words one finds objectionable are responded to with more words or with stoney silence, not by deletion, moderation, or banning. That's the way it's always been here, as you well know. But one more time, to be perfectly clear: I don't see the slur(s) to which you refer in the words of Pale Scot; not here, and not at BJKeefe's blog.

Pale Scot is in your house now, making crude racialist slurs. Victim card? I think not.

As I said, we differ. I think so, and I said as much.

You only care if allegedly "racist" speech is uttered by conservatives.

No, I only care if alleged racist speech is, in fact, racist speech. Saying you look swarthier than your average Scot isn't a racist statement, no matter how much you whine that it is. You also don't look particularly chinese, and probably aren't female, either. (If you believe my saying so in any way slights you, chinese people or women, that only shows that you are a nutjob.)

((Now, whether my saying that is an insult to nutjobs, may be a debatable point...))

Have a good night, Donalde... And toughen up... There's no shame in not being a Scotsman, and even less in not looking like one. Alot of folks aren't and don't... It's not the end of the world. You'll live.

AYATOLLAH TRUTHMENI 101 said...

In no way do I think Don is prejudiced. He hates everything.

I respect him for his consistency.

Have a good night Donald and may Allah bless you my brother.

Kevin Robbins said...

It's those Irish supremacists that piss me off with their St. Patrick's Day and "kiss me I'm Irish" crap. Full of blarney they are.

Donald Douglas said...

Fail!!

RepRaceMasterHateNihilist:

Your own words: "Saying you look swarthier than your average Scot isn't a racist statement, no matter how much you whine that it is."

"Swarthy"? Even my own students understand that no one uses the "word" swarthy EXCEPT as a term of disparagement.

PALE. SCOT. IS. A. RACIST. BIGOT.

Nope. Do not pass go. BJ Keefe confirmed the bigotry at his blog, but argued for free speech. And you protested at that post that you should not be held accountable for another's words. But now that Pale Scot --- A RACIST HANDLE INVENTED TO DISPARAGE ME --- is in the AmNi house "it's not racist."

PATHETIC. OPPORTUNIST. DEHUMANIZING.

That's the definition of hypocrisy and bigotry. You. Are. A. Sick. Disgusting. Hater.

And actually, Barack Obama, in loading hip hip on his iPod, is championing the most base racial stereotypes. Why haven't you attacked Obama? You say that advancing racial stereotypes is, well, racist. So, Obama's racist, as you note:

"The urban stereotype, based on the color of one's skin, is the thing that infers racial inferiority. Anyone who stereotypes another race--or even their own race--in a negative way is guilty of racism; one needn't be white to do it. One only needs to say "the people of this race as a whole are less (less intelligent, less moral, less attractive, less human, ...) than the people of other races, because of the race they are." One only need pass judgement on others, based on their race."

That's the definition of hypocrisy and bigotry. You. Are. A. Sick. Disgusting. Hater.

Repsac3: You are an unprincipled hack, who through double standards focusing on my race or alleged racial insensitivity, has demonstrated beyond a resonable doubt your own racism, bigotry, and ideological hatred. I'm demanding a retraction of your allegations of racism, and an correction to this post here as well. exDLB has also advanced the hate. I'm expecting apologies.

AMERICAN NIHILIST IS A WHITE SUPREMACIST HATE SITE

Donald Douglas said...

Offensive speech or not offensive speech? Well, it was offensive to the RaceMasterReppy, but then when RACIST PALE SCOT is called out in the AmNi house, it's not offensive. Yo! Or, let's just say that ReppyRaceMasterSupramcist is a FUCKING HATE-SPONSORING HYPOCRITE.

Here's RepHateMasters words:

"As I said earlier, people don't need you, or me, or Brendan, to "protect" them from unpleasant words and ideas. (And that you believe your readers do is truly sad, in my opinion.) They're big boys and girls, and they can handle both reading something offensive, and responding to it appropriately, by blaming the party responsible for saying it. Hiding away offensive words and thoughts isn't good for anyone. It's treating your readers as children, and it shields the offender from having to take responsibility for what he said. Just bad all around, if ya ask me..."

And now:

"He doesn't seem to be offering anything in the way of racial/white supremacy, that I can see....

BWAHHAAHHAAAA!!!!

OFFENSIVE. NOT OFFENSIVE? Which is it, ReppyHaterBigot?

FAIL. HATE. MASTER. FUCKING. HYPOCRITE.

You wanted your quotes. YOU'VE GOT YOUR QUOTES ....

Donald Douglas said...

.... I want my apology and retraction.

I'll be checking in throughout the day.

NO APOLOGY = PROOF OF YOUR POSTMODERN TRUTH.

NO APOLOGY = PROOF OF YOUR IDEOLOGICAL BIGOTRY.

NO APOLOGY = PROOF OF YOUR OWN RACIST CAMPAIGN AGAINST ROCKIN' DOC D!!

repsac3 said...

Dr Douglas, you're acting like an idiot. I'm not even going to bother linking you to a friggin' dictionary, but I really advise that in future, you try checking one or two before getting your underoos all in a bunch like this over a word you obviously fail to comprehend the meaning of.

And as I think I mentioned before, ThePaleScot has been leaving blog comments since at least 2008, so no, it's probably not all about you... While you may believe the world revolves around you, sadly, it is not the fact. People have screen names and post comments that do not involve you, in the least... (Like the dictionary, Google can prevent you from saying stupid things, but only if you take the time to use them, rather than blathering off, half cocked.)

If you want me to say you're not acting like a bigot, you're going to have to stop acting like one. Beyond that, there's little I can do for you... and I suggest you stop all the whining, because you're only makin' yourself look more silly with every word, and dude, that's probably some kind of a "FAIL," or something. (I'm not real hip to the CAPITAL LETTER, bold, excessively.-punctuated. vernacular, but I'm pretty sure that's what the kids you're imitating would call it, regardless.)

And dude... Determine what you're trying to say and how to spell all the words, before hitting the ol' publish button... Four tries on a comment is at least two too many...

Posted by Donald Douglas to American Niiiiihilist at October 8, 2010 9:50 AM
Posted by Donald Douglas to American Niiiiihilist at October 8, 2010 10:09 AM
Posted by Donald Douglas to American Niiiiihilist at October 8, 2010 10:15 AM
Posted by Donald Douglas to American Niiiiihilist at October 8, 2010 10:15 AM


Thanks for stopping by, Dr Douglas. Always a pleasure setting you straight.

repsac3 said...

Ah... Now some of the other comments appear... (I promise you, the only one here when I begat my last bit was the one from 9:50, am. (They're all in my mailbox, though... I assumed Dr Douglas deleted the others, but seemingly not.)

As to your quotes, Donalde:

What you seem to be missing is where I ever said saying you was swarthy WAS an offensive comment. It's not in any of your quotes. That first quote says that even if YOU (or any blogger, in my opinion) find it (or any comment on a blog) offensive, they ought to fight bad words with good, and denounce, or debate, or ridicule the offensive comment, rather than moderating it away, even to protect their delicate readers. It's not the first time I've said it, and it won't be the last.

Good try, though... At least you're trying to give concrete examples, rather than just making generalized accusations that amount to nothing.

You're free to keep checking in--every hour on the hour, if that's what makes your boat float--but there will be no apology forthcoming from me for saying that "swarthy" isn't an ethnic slur, or that your bigotronics, is.

Regardless, we'll see you again shortly, I guess... I'm so looking forward to it. (though I can't promise I'll actually be around for all of your visits... It's another nice day, here in the East.)

Donald Douglas said...

"If you want me to say you're not acting like a bigot, you're going to have to stop acting like one".

Double standards.

As I showed yesterday, you deny there's no anarchist left. You were proved wrong. And no response.

Now no response to Obama's racial steoreotypes and bigotry-endorsements.

And now you deny that you once agreed PALE SCOT's comments were offensive.

And now no apology is your concession that you are an evil race-bait sponsor.

But we already knew that.

Donald Douglas said...

Hypocrisy thy name is RepMasterWhiteSupremacistHateSponsor:

'More on Racial Double Standards'.

repsac3 said...

Again, do your research before posting.

In fact, I have responded to each of your silly allegations.

"And now you deny that you once agreed PALE SCOT's comments were offensive."

Yes, I do... I invite you to post the quote where I agree that Pale Scot's comment was offensive. At best, I think I said I was unsure, in one of my comments, but even there I said that I didn't see it. So yes, I deny that I ever agreed with anyone who said it was offensive, which is an acceptable thing to do, if in fact I never did aggree with your statement.

(Sometimes, I think you believe the denial itself is the smoking gun that proves folks guilty. There is no shame or wrongdoing in denying a thing that isn't true, Dr. Douglas. A Denial isn't a smoking gun.)

If you really believe I did this thing I'm denying, provide the quote in question, or admit that you're not telling the truth.

Yeah, and I saw that other post of yours... There's no point in bothering, as the facts about that one are at the link you supply in your own post and (as usual), I trust that the majority of your readers are smart enough to figure out the truth, just from the context. (The ones foolish enough to just buy into your allegations, sight unseen, just ain't worth the time it'd take to dissuade 'em. Stupid is as stupid does... which kinda goes for you as well, come to think of it. You know better, but you just can't be bothered to care, even if you end up makin' yourself look like an idiot. Whatever, Donalde... The facts on that old bullshit that you're still whining about are well laid out, and the chips'll fall as they do.)

Donald Douglas said...

Here is your discussion of free speech rights to be offensive:

"As I said earlier, people don't need you, or me, or Brendan, to "protect" them from unpleasant words and ideas".

"UNPLEASANT WORDS." Exactly. Because they are offensive. Thanks for the acknowledgement.

"Swarthy" is not understood in isolation but in context as a racial slur:

"The Pale Scot said...

Damn Don, howda a swarthy looking fellow like you end with a fine Scottish name Like Douglas? And a Donald to boot!? America is a wonderful place where we can all re-invent ourselves"
.

Repsac3, I have known you online for what, 3 years? You have proved there is no accepted truth time and again. When you've been shown wrong you deny it, ignore it, change the subject, change the definition, blame someone else ... etc. and so forth.

The Pale Scot issue is raised because it's bigotry, it's offensive. It's not acceptable for moral people. Why is the color of my skin an acceptable debate topic? Why? In political campaigns, etc., most people expect to be color blind. Brendan acknowledged it, but claimed free speech. YOU defended the free speech zone in ALL your quotes. In the long run, I don't really care since as so many of my readers have said, "if you jump in the mud with a pig expect to get dirty".

You are ugly and dirty, but I'm showing YOU for who YOU are and I'm calling on you to come clean.

Frankly, if you won't apologize you should just call it a day and claim victory and quit this blog.

Donald Douglas said...

ReppySlaveMasterSupremacist defended Brendan's right to host hateful, bigoted comments.

And Brendan himself distanced himself from the "slur":

"I did not care for the content of that comment, but I chose to ignore it ... I do not feel compelled to engage with every last random person who utters a slur of this nature...".

And try as he might, ReppySlaveMasterSupremacist can't deny that he defended Brendan's right to post the hate.

Once again, YOU are DIRT. I'm showing YOUR hatred. I'm calling on you to come clean.

Frankly, if you won't apologize just call it a day and claim victory and quit American Racist Nihilist.

Will said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dobby said...

"Swarthy"? Even my own students understand that no one uses the "word" swarthy EXCEPT as a term of disparagement. - Donald Douglas, 12:28 pm 10/8/10.

If we accept this as an absolute truth, then why didn't I see you chastising "dave in boca" when he called Obama a "swarthy avatar" on ... wait for it ... The American Power Blog? I eagerly await your aoplogy for that comment. Awww, who the hell am I kidding? You're going to delete the comment and pretend it never happened.

repsac3 said...

:::sigh:::

So, no direct quote, then... Just you deciding that my using the phrase "unpleasant words or ideas" proves that I believed PScot's words to be racist, even though there is no time or comment where I actually said so (and a few where I said "I don't see the slur"), and even though I already explained the broader point I was making.

Well, at least we now know what you're talking about. Folks can judge for themselves whether your theory holds any water.

""Swarthy" is not understood in isolation but in context as a racial slur."

I'm sorry Donalde, but I still disagree. Making a statement about race or about racial features isn't inherently racist. People use such features all the time to physically describe friends, co workers, family members, witnesses, alleged criminals, and all manner of folks to people who need to know what they look like. And, when there is something notable about a person's "ethnic" features (say, a girl with red hair, light skin and freckles, who also has a chinese name), it is acceptable to comment to her about it, without much of anyone thinking it's bigoted to do so.

It's not racist for a fellow professor at LBCC to tell a student looking for you, "He was just here a second ago... I'm sure he'll be back in a second because he always spends the 1 pm hour here on Fridays... When he comes back, Dr Douglas will be a tall, clean shaven, dark skinned fellow in his late 40's with a full head of darkish hair with greying temples. I think he's wearing a dark suit with a red tie with a blue stripe, today." It's not racist to say you're dark-skinned (or "swarthy," for that matter). It's a description of you that gives the student a better idea of who he's looking for. No harm, no foul.

Again, racism and bigotry are about treating whole classes of people as less than everyone else, based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, ... . It is not saying that someone has a particular skin color, or even that their skin color (or eye shape, or hair color, or build) is unusual for someone with the name they have. Saying that most folks with the name Donald Douglas have lighter skin than you do isn't an insult to anyone... It isn't saying that anyone is better or lesser than anyone else.

As for the anonymous (or non-anonymous) folks in your circle talking about pigs and mud, they're welcome to their opinions. You're welcome to agree with their opinions, too. You already know what I think...

"And Brendan himself distanced himself from the "slur":"

Yes, he did... Perhaps Brendan can come to your aid and explain to me what he found offensive about it, because as I've repeatedly said in a whole bunch of venues now, I don't see it.

(Yes, Donald... "The Left" disagrees with "itself," sometimes... Brendan can believe one thing, while I believe something different... In fact, for all your bluster about "the Left," it happens a whole lot over on this side of the political spectrum. Big tent, and all that. We're not all blue dog Democrats, or liberals, or socialists, either... We are a whole lotta different things, and have a whole lotta different beliefs, even from each other. Perhaps you'll try keeping that in mind, in future. Just as Brendan and I disagree as to whether PaleScot said something offensive, most Dems disagree with the tenets of Marxism. Please make a note of it.)

repsac3 said...

"And try as he might, ReppySlaveMasterSupremacist can't deny that he defended Brendan's right to post the hate.""

Other than whether the comment was, in fact, hate (and the childish name, he gave me, of course), DonaldeMcWhinyPoopyPantsDouglas is correct; Not only don't I deny that I defended Brendan's (and my, and even Donald's) right to post hateful, bigoted, disagreeable posts and commentary by others on his (and his, and my) blog, I defended everyone's right (and I argue, responsibility) to post/leave posted such materials, full-throatedly. I believe the best disinfectant is sunshine and the condemnation of others, and Donald's habit of moderating his blog for content and deleting comments that are offensive (aside his own, of course) (Not to mention his habit of demanding that other blogs delete comments he finds offensive)) is the wrong way to go.

So no, I don't deny it. There is no right (constitutional or otherwise) not to be offended. Donald needs to grow up himself, and to treat his readers like the adults they are, as well.

AYATOLLAH TRUTHMENI 101 said...

This reminds me of when I was a young lad going to Holy Family in North Chicago.

Back then it seemed all the cool guys were black. Muhammad Ali. Joe Frazier. Hank Aaron. Shaft. Redd Foxx. Dr. King had been assassinated a couple years before but the reverence every kid at Holy Family and the Navy housing I lived on was sincere and unanimous. God how I wanted to be black so I could be like those guys.



Don my friend; if we look for racism in every word or deed we'll find it. Then the racists win. If Palescot meant to be racist or race bating with his use of the word "swarthy" then shame on him. If he meant something along the line of dapper or dignified, then I also think you look dapper and dignified.

Donald Douglas said...

Well, finally, you agree the comment was offensive, and that Brendan found it to be an offensive racial "slur." And so you are reduced to First Amendment arguments, which is what I have shown all along, that you tolerate bigotry on your side when it suits you but attack others for bigotry when that suits you. That's hateful and hypocritical. And that's you.

As I've said all along: I don't care what Pale Scot thinks of me. He's entitled to his hatred. What's so juicy is the extreme contortions all of you have been making to dodge, deny, defend, excuse and promote the hatred. As you note above:

"I believe the best disinfectant is sunshine and the condemnation of others.."

But you won't condemn. Or, at least you were condeming The Pale Scot's bigoted slurs before you endorsed The Pale Scot's bigoted slurs as a right to freedom expression.

And of course no one has the right not to be offended. When did I ever say there wasn't? Nice try. Where are my quotes? Without that your argument is totally lame. At issue at all times is your rank hypocrisy, undeniable, and in fact demonically hilarious by now.

So in sum: Brendan repeatedly has denounced "offensive comments" and "slurs" based on the color of one's skin. "For the ninety-eighth time: I do not endorse people coming to conclusions on the basis on skin color". And you have not only defended Brendan and Pale Scot, you welcome people who see me first as a black man and not a man. Unlike you, I don't defend discrimination on the basis of race. Clearly, as a person of color, I have an extra interest in a color blind society. And now you're going on about how I'm a dark-skinned guy who doesn't look Chinese?

Man you are just fucked. So, call it a victory and retire this blog. Either that or man up an apologize and we can all move forward as moral Americans who respect different opinions without racialize them as all of you have been doing.

Donald Douglas said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dobby said...

...you tolerate bigotry on your side when it suits you but attack others for bigotry when that suits you. That's hateful and hypocritical. And that's you. Donald Douglas - 2:34 pm, 10/8/10

Is this guy really that unaware of himself? For over a year now DD left up a comment on his own site that called Obama "swarthy." That's being such an absolutist is just f'n silly.

repsac3 said...

"Well, finally, you agree the comment was offensive,..."

When people accuse you of not being able to read, this is the kinda thing they're referring to...

Where did I ever make such an agreement? Quote it, please.

Because as far as I'm concerned, I said the opposite several times, just in my last comment (or "pair of comments, I guess), alone... If you saw something else, you have a different understanding of the words I wrote than most people would. Either that, or you're just lying...

But you go on and explain what the fuck you're talking about in saying that "I now (or finally) agree that the comment was offensive".

We'll wait.

repsac3 said...

Second, the only time I used the terms "first amendment" or "free speech" were in response to your using them in the comment to which I was replying. (Go on, check... Again, we'll wait.)

My "Free Speech" argument (which in fact, has very little to do with the First Amendment, which only covers government suppression of speech) says that EVERYONE (and I even mentioned you by name, you moron, putting the lie to your specious claim that's a "liberals only" thing) should allow folks to comment freely on their blogs, and that the answer to offensive speech isn't deletion, moderation or banning, but more speech.

I don't see how I could've said it more clearly, or why you failed to grasp the meaning, and instead saw something that only applied to one political wing, and not the other. But Donalde... It's stupid miusunderstandings like these that make folks question your reading abilities.

If you wish to quote the part that causes you to believe I wasn't talking about ALL bloggers of ALL political stripes, feel free to commence quoting and explaining... The floor is yours...

repsac3 said...

" you were condeming The Pale Scot's bigoted slurs..."

Anybody wondering why Donalde makes this accusation but fails to quote of my condemnation of Pale Scot's bigoted slur(s)?

Me, too.

Anyone think he'll quote it, anytime soon?

Me, neither.

repsac3 said...

"And of course no one has the right not to be offended. When did I ever say there wasn't?"

I think Donalde means when did I ever say there was, but the answer remains the same. Donalde has never directly said that people have the right (constitutional or otherwise) not to be offended, but his habit of deleting offensive comments at his own blog, and his discussions about others deleting offensive comments on their blogs (how often has Donald suggested that I delete one post or comment or another from American Nihilist, because it was offensive? What does Donald say to bjkeefe about the Pale Scott's comment, and how bj's failure to delete it proves he's "down with" what PScott said?) does lead folks to believe that Donald does believe people do have a right not to be offended by the posts and comments on blogs... If Donalde wishes to offer an alternate explanation for his call for deletions of what he believes to be offensive commentary on folk's blogs, we're ready to read and evaluate it.

repsac3 said...

So in sum: Brendan repeatedly has denounced "offensive comments" and "slurs" based on the color of one's skin. "For the ninety-eighth time: I do not endorse people coming to conclusions on the basis on skin color".

I'm pretty sure he's only referring to one comment or slur, but yes, he did classify the comment as a slur, and he did denounce it. Further, I'm sure he would denounce other slurs he believed to be offensive (which I'd guess would be anything he considered to be a slur... I mean, are there non-offensive slurs?)

"And you have not only defended Brendan and Pale Scot, you welcome people who see me first as a black man and not a man."

I'm pretty sure I only very recently talked about disagreeing with bjkeefe regarding PScott's comment, so I find it interesting how you come back saying I'm defending bj in this matter. I'm saying I think he's wrong, which is some kinda mighty bad defense, I'd say. (You're free to see it differently, but again, there's that question about your reading comprehension...)

Dude, you are a man. You are a black man. You are a gray haired man. You are a suited man, much of the time. You're a married man. You're a conservative man. All of these things define you and distinguish you from other men in the room. None of them are bigoted descriptions, because none of them say you're less of a man than those that are white, or have blond hair, or dress in jeans and tees, or are liberal, or unmarried. Denying your skin color exists, or pretending that any/all mention of it is raaaaacist!! is kinda sad.

It's not bigoted to say most Scotsmen are fair-skinned, even though you're not. You can pretend that it is, but it still isn't.

No one here, including PScott, sees you as a black man first. We also don't see you as a Scotsman first. In fact, we generally don't care what kinda man you are, unless you bring it up.

I don't defend discrimination on the basis of race (or anything else) either. If you had any evidence I did, you'd've offered it, by now.

You're smart enough to understand what I meant by saying you don't look Chinese (or like a woman). Read it over a few times, until the meaning sinks in...

You can do it, Donald... I know you can read, and understand the concepts, even when you pretend otherwise...

I look forward to your cogent replies...

Donald Douglas said...

Ring around the rosy Reppy blowin' smokey.

This is called obfuscation and prevarication. You are wrong and you're playing games.

I've already provided all the quotes you need to argue one way or the other. Either you repudiate the hatred or you don't. Because we are in agreement that these statements by your buddy The Pale Scot are offensive. Indeed, as linked above, you wrote: "As I said earlier, people don't need you, or me, or Brendan, to 'protect' them from unpleasant words and ideas." And you are defending Brendan, who himself said that those comments were "based on the color of one's skin". You're digging deeper with fisking and evasion. Everyone who's participated in this debate, Brendan, exDLB, and yourself have understood these comments as offensive and harmful, which is why you in turn that no one has a right not to be offended ....

Donald Douglas said...

.... In sum: You are wrong and in avoidance on anarchism and the far-left (despite your denials). You are wrong on the president's endorsement of racial stereotyping (linked), and you won't condemn him. And you are wrong on Pale Scot. The content of the comments are hateful and offensive. Everyone agrees, and again, you've said "Holding bloggers responsible for every word that come out of the keyboard of any commenter on their blog is just stupid, and I can't speak for Brendan, but I reject it completely". Why reject it if you don't want to be tarred as hateful. THAT is YOUR argument.

You don't want to be held accountable for racist, bigoted, or unpleasant comments. Fine. Since they are ugly I again expect you to issue an apology for hosting the hate ("the anti-Johnny Winters"). Either that or declare you've fatally destroyed Le Donalde and call it a day. Retire your hate-sponsorship. You win.

thepalescot said...

Ok, Don I'm sorry I upset you, I didn't take into account that you're a touchy feelly west coaster, i should have remembered that from working HR tech support outfits in NYC; that our Cal clients had to handled with kid gloves, but you're not my client. I grew up in Carteret NJ. The town sport was passing ethnic slurs back and forth. Did you see Gran Torino, a rock ribbed conservative like yourself has to be a Clint fan.

Martin: Great, a polack and a chink.
Walt; How you doing Martin? you crazy Italian prick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGUMhLRO7Tg

Grow a set of fuckin' balls man. God, Californians are such pussies.

I use a nom de' plume because I have a carry permit and zero tolerance policy toward being bothered. Why the permit? Because of all the crazy, carjacking, home invading, meth snorting white people down here.

If I was you I'd be removing your stuff from the web. When Cal goes belly up, the first jobs on the block will be non-essentials like poly-sci prof. And Corporate PCish HR dept. aren't go touch you with ten foot pole.

But I think this whole schick of yours is a con, an educated man who admires his blue collar dad can't be as slight seeking as you try to be. Unless he's grasping for a Fox news gig,

Good Luck. Just remember we're at peak oil. and very soon the economy is going to collapse. Hope you've stayed fit enough to stay ahead of the cannibals in the the west coast dead zone. I'm tucked away in the rural south stocking up on ammo, seeds and agricultural hand tools. Ya can't eat gold. Don't worry, all this will soon be over..

The Johnny Winter line is about his music, he is old enough and white to be a Lawrence Welk fan, at least that is what one could assume form looking at a picture of him. instead he's a kick ass blues guitarist who rolls with muddy waters and James Cotton, I wish I could be that white. While if one was look at a picture of you, one could blithely assume that you're a member of the NAACP, the Muslim Brotherhood, ACORN or the Sicilian Mob. But that's not true, is it. Your a warmonger who never served, a Randian with an unproductive government job. Top of my list unnecessary government spending is social sciences education, we physicists and material engineers. not BS artists, the country needs you to go Galt.

Concerning UU, you do know that A. Jackson was the first president to be a trinitarian? And that was a deathbed conversion.

repsac3 said...

Donalde, you're clearly an idiot.

I understand why you need to cling to your belief that my using the phrase "unpleasant words and ideas" means I thought PScott's comment was or contained unpleasant words and ideas, but I told you several comments ago that your belief is wrong. (Of course, this should've been apparent by my repeatedly saying that I didn't see the slur, which I said several times at the various places and posts where this was being discussed, as well as several times in this very comment stream. You're wrong, I promise you. I did not then and do not now believe that PScott's comment was or is racially offensive. I cannot be more clear.

Now you can keep clinging to your insistence that I did or do think it was offensive, in spite of my telling you otherwise, if you wish, but you're only going to continue looking like a damned fool.

I only repudiate hate and such when I think something is hateful. And as I've already and repeatedly said I didn't and don't see the hateful slur, inPScott's words, they aren't something I'll be repudiating.

The argument about holding bloggers responsible for every word posted in their comment sections is a separate question, and one I've been making to you, for years.

You have a nasty habit of not being able to tell the difference between the blog owner and the people who write posts or comments. You do it constantly with Daily Kos. You did it when whining about how "I" tried to threaten your job. And you did it to Brendan as regards PaleScott's comment.

Whatever *I* think of PScott's comment (which I really hope you understand, by now) **YOU** felt offended by it. But for some reason, you lashed out at Brendan, as though he was responsible for the comment that offended you. And Donalde, that's a stupid thing to do. And that's what I was saying when I said "Holding bloggers responsible for every word that come out of the keyboard of any commenter on their blog is just stupid, and I can't speak for Brendan, but I reject it completely".

I stand by those words. Blaming Brendan (or me, or Markos) because PScott (or Octopus, or any random diarist or commenter on Daily Kos) offended **YOU** (not "offended me," but "offended *****you***** -- Can I fucking well be ANY more clear, here?!?) is a stupid, stupid thing to do, especially when the person you're attacking has come out in opposition to that which offended you, themselves... like Brendan did, regarding PScott's comment. (And like I did, in saying Octopus shouldn't contact your place of work.)

If you still don't understand that argument, or how it is I can say that *YOU* being offended doesn't give you the right to go off half cocked at anyone in the area, while at the *SAME TIME* thinking you should NOT even be offended, in the first place, then Donalde, I cannot help you understand... Persist in your fantasy where I agreed with you that PScott's comment was offensive... I'm sure your dreamworld is a lovely, peaceful place for you... Enjoy your "victory" celebration with the fuzzy ducks, ponies, and blue unicorns that no doubt inhabit that "special" world you've created in your head...

repsac3 said...

PScott... You are a bit harsh on the social scientists, dude...

Artists and thinkers are vital to this world...

Math and science are great, but they alone would make for a pretty boring world... (For one thing, no Winters brothers... Think about it, and shudder...)

(There, I found something to disagree with you about. Perhaps now, Donalde can rest easy (or "easier," anyway...)

Kevin Robbins said...

Man, and here I thought I worked hard all day. You guys have all been nose to the keyboard over, what? Someone used the word swarthy and we scoundrels at AmNi have refused to drag him over the coals for it. Holy Fuck!

Don, if we're a white supremacist site I think you need to get out in the tubes a bit more. I'm pretty sure we don't fit the profile. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that apology.

Reppy, if we're going to be a white supremacist site I think we have some re-decorating to do. Maybe we should call "Queer Eye for the Straight Aryan." Hope Don doesn't think I'm all hatin' on the gays now. Definitely think it calls for some confederate flags and swastikas at the very least.

Dobby, thanks for pointing out the unmitigated racial hatred expressed by the use of the word swarthy at Don's blog. It is a well known white supremacist site, though.

Pale Scot, love the irony of Don taking government money to do a job that produces nothing. He is the bizarro world John Galt. If Don has any common sense (a stretch I know) he'll take your career advice about scrubbing as much of his lunacy as possible from the web. Of course, we remain a testament to it. Who knows how much dead wood Meg Whitman will take the budget ax to if she gets elected? I'd like to go job hunting with all the nutty shit online he has.

Oh yeah, and Pale Scot thanks to you I believe we have a new comment record. I hereby present you with a laurel and hearty handshake. Shhhh, don't tell Don but that's from Blazing Saddles the most racist movie ever made.

repsac3 said...

Blazing Saddles defined "politically incorrect" before the phrase was invented... And that's the truth.

repsac3 said...

You are correct about the comment record, D... ex... Kevin...

Previous record, 29, at another of your posts...

So apparently, you is the man with the draw, comment-wise... Somebody'll no doubt be whipping out your prize, anytime now...

thepalescot said...

I don't think Johnny and Edger never got gov. gig, cheez maybe.

The problem with SS is it creates a refuge for all the propeller heads who figure out how to get paid for bouncing around the rubber room inside their skull. Art ed would be nice for everyone but my experience with 2 required courses I took in college was that it was a waste (It's Tuesday so this must be Belgium), But I lived a train ride away from NYC and bounced between the Met the Gugg and the Cloisters all the time (great places to take a new girl) and then slide over to CBGBs to catch Johnny Thunder or David Johansen, So I'm jaded. What I'd like to see is for poly-sci and economists to be outsourced. I'm sure there's PHds in New Delhi that can kill chickens and read entrails just as well as the guys in Chicago, they need to be introduced to the concept of Karmic load. And those instaguys at Tenn., who are they kidding "going galt"their shit would be tossed out their office before they got back from dropping off their resignation. There's 500 people standing right behind them.

Ravi Shankar or Johnny Winter are going to do fine wherever you drop them off.

repsac3 said...

Well, apparently Dr Douglas has decided, based on this comment from yesterday at 1:56 PM , that I am a racist. (He's even created a link to it, similar to AmNi's “black her'tge trail" sidebar.)

Personally, I think the comment makes a pretty good argument against my being a racist, but as Truth says above, "If we look for racism in every word or deed, we'll find it." I've no doubt that some who make the trip from American power will buy into Donald's charge of racism--and I hope that if they do, they explain how what I said was racist (which is more than Dr Douglas has been able to do, obviously)--but I also believe that many from there will read through the comment to which Donalde points, and wonder what the fuck he's talking about. (I'd hope that they actually ask him that, but one cannot expect miracles. Just the fact that they're thinking it is satisfaction enough...)

For the record, here is the link to the comment where I discussed unpleasant words and ideas. It's clear from the context that the unpleasant words to which I was referring were not the ones posted by Pale Scott to bjkeefe's blog, but encompassed ANY unpleasant words or ideas posted as a comment to ANY blog, and the idea that blog owners ought not moderate such comments away with the delete button, but should instead allow them to stay posted as a bad example, and also allow other readers respond to such commentary with more words of their own...

It is clear from the context that Donald's interpretation of the phrase "unpleasant words and ideas" as a means to excuse racism is unfounded, and way off base...

AYATOLLAH TRUTHMENI 101 said...

Poor Don probably is having traffic problems. The easiest way to get more traffic is to start a feud. In Don's case, rehash it.

His blog was alot busier when I was a regular before the first banning. If he apologises I may consent to coming back. I am widely known as the Forgiving Ayatollah.

Kevin Robbins said...

Thanks for the link to that thread at Brendan's, Reppy. That was some kind of hilarious. I know now I never want to be in a war of words with Mr. O'Keefe or you either for that matter. That was brutal. I think Don is just too cheap to pay a dominatrix.

Anonymous said...

zlata naložba [url=http://www.vzajemniskladi.info]delniški skladi[/url]