And, addressing the purpose of Donalde's drive-by trolltack, one has to be a real douchebag to intentionally spread offline (and seemingly, unverified) information about another blogger to get revenge for some online difference of opinion. (After all, isn't posting (or, in the following referenced case, reposting) offline information what this freakout was--and continues to be-- all about?) Given the sickos out there, it can be an invitation for trouble.
Bad enough, if the info's actually accurate.
Worse yet, if they're painting the bullseye on the wrong guy's back.
---
Added:
1) Sadly, No! - Die Verwandlung
And apparently (with h/t to S,N! link @#1):
2) Who is Tintin at Sadly, No? Jonah Goldberg, of course! ~ Serr8d's Cutting Edge:
"This deleted comment from Dr. Donald Douglas found at Brendan's (bjkeefe) 'Free Speech! blog...I believe this is the second time Donalde has said that he moderates the comments to his blog for content, before to allowing them to appear, even, just because of me... I don't think I'm really all that scary a guy... Not even if I actually am "potentially even more dangerous than those hoisting banners on the street," who'd "kill you if [I got] the chance." (And I may be... I just may be...)
"I moderate comments primarily against your racist attacks, Reppy, but your stupid remark is beside the point."
If that's really true (and Donalde has at least twice said that it is), I think that's kinda pathetically cowardly and sad... The record of most of what's gone on between us exists (Is anything ever really gone on the internet?) and I just don't believe that Donalde's self-confessed fear of me is warranted... They're just blog comments, and most of 'em were on topic and on point, and not at all about him... (Personally, I think the guy just doesn't like being shown up and beaten down right there on his own blog... but of course, that's just my opinion, and worth every cent you paid for it.)
3) The dreaded, diabolical, Donalde Douglass double-down. (Cached version) Despite "Carl's" denial, the ass prof is stickin' by his story, true or false. Also no recognition of the hypocrisy of shouting other folk's personal info far and wide--and whether he's factually correct or not, he thinks he is... In his mind, he is intentionally "outing" a pseudononymous blogger's given name, with the intent doing him some kinda reputational (if not actual) harm, all because of petty online disagreements--which is kinda weird, given all that whining he did when folk's posted his employer info online. (And lest we forget, that employer information was already online--and still is. It's even posted on Donalde's own blog, even.)
In any case, the truth is out there...
4) Why double down, when you can triple dig that "isreally" grave? (Cached version) "First rule of holes? That's only a suggestion, idnit? No, I'll just keep on keepin' on..."
There's no conspiracy that can't be made to sound even more conspiratorial and crazier with a whole lot more verbiage expressing even less possibility that one might, maybe, be mistaken. QED
5) American Power: Carl [Salamipants] Flushed Down the Memory Hole at Whiskey Fire!. (Cached version) The denials and off-topic trollery deletions (and calling him "Donalde," of course... I mean, who knows to do that, besides Tintin?) is the proof. Confession is good for the soul. It's obvious. Actor's T, and Carl is he, and we are all together. Koo-Koo Ka-Choo
(The possibility that folks are deleting his stupid fucking allegations and accusations for being in violation of online integritude, inane, or just plain off-friggin' topic never crosses Donalde's mind. He's got his meme, and he's stickin' to it, no matter what.)
6) At Carltintin's request--in a tweet to "himself," natch--all mentions of Carltintin's full name up to now will be disposed of. New mentions will be deleted. (Just further proof that we're all Tintin, I guess... TINTIN ISREAL!!!)
7) So, if other folks deleting his "Carl" comments was proof of a vast leftwing cover-up, what does it mean when Donaldee deletes his own posts on the subject? Is HE now part of the conspiracy, too?!?
"I'm on the verge of obtaining the mother of all tips on Tintin's identity. So until that information becomes available, and since Carl [] is threatening punitive retaliation against those looking into his shady his activities, I'm temporarily pulling my previous posts in the series." - Donald Kent Douglas - American Power: Outing Tintin at Sadly No!
8) American Power: Carl [] Threatens Libel Action Our little energizer bunny of malice is still going... Someone may or may not've brought a lawsuit against him. (He believes so, but I think the phrase "It's brought" is kinda vague, and could easily mean something other than what Dr Douglas thinks it does. On the other hand, he might be right. Either way, the posts pertaining to this subject that he took down are still down. Lawsuit or not, he's still talking tough, but acting kinda intimidated... YMMV...) And the intimidation tactics he's throwing in return (Countersuits, "Carl doesn't want this kind of publicity..." "The conservasphere will rise up like an army of Davids and investigate every aspect of his life if he sues..." don't seem to be having much effect. Still no big reveal, either...
9) (5/18/11) Added cached versions of the disappeared posts. Still no big reveal (or any mention of the topic at all, since 5/16/11) over at Donalde's blog.
10) (5/19/11) And Donalde keeps digging: American Power: Update on [] For the Record Of note, is this secton, where he says:
"Anyway, my (other) longstanding nemesis (James Casper) has been getting off on all of this, so I decided to drop a non-profane comment in the thread pictured, but he deleted it --- four times. Racist Repsac3 is one of the most hardcore free speech blog administrators online, but he wouldn't let this one through, despite the specific omission of actor212's identity. Maybe he didn't want that link to actor212's comment at Sadly No!, although that's an ad hoc adjustment. Racist Repsac3 = Casper keeps moving the goalposts:
The problem that Donalde has is that he jumps to conclusions. The fact was, his comment (the one he attempted to post 4 times in the space of just over an hour) was caught in the spam filter. I saw it, I added the comment (the first attempt, for the record), and deleted the three repeats.
I didn't screencap my spam comment queue, but the comment itself is posted here, just where Dr Douglas left it.
Jumps to conclusions... If this little incident isn't a metaphor for this whole hypocritical, conspiratorial (conspocritorical?) incident involving the "outing" of one/some of his enemies "real life" lives in the name of vengeance--if not much of Donalde's blogging, itself--I don't know what is. Donalde fixates on one idea--the one that most fits his chosen meme of 'fuck that other guy,' generally--and refuses to admit there could be any other possible possibility aside the one he's chosen.
A) [] IS Tintin. (Quite likely untrue, which is why it's at least a 50/50 shot that Donalde's disappeared posts will never again appear at his American Power blog.
B) I intentionally deleted his comment four times. (Check the bogus claim and the proof for yourself.)
C) Sasquatch Isreal represents the "'legitimacy myth' of Israel’s existence. As there’s of course a “Sasquatch myth,” it’s worth noting the implied comparison: that Israel is also an ape-like beast existing only in historical folklore. Absent legitimacy, Israel has 'no right to exist.'” [cite] (Need I say more?)
(For those interested or curious, there are more examples of Donalde seeing just what he wishes/chooses to see in this post.)
Maybe Donalde will correct his post, and maybe he won't. But either way, he's already shown himself to be a little too quick on the trigger, and I've shown it's not an anomaly. It happens entirely too often, and when it does, it's done with the purpose of attacking some perceived enemy with his quickly drawn (if not actually concocted out of thin air) conclusions.
Still waiting on the big reveal.
11) (5/26/11) - Just a quick non-update update. The closest our friend Donald Kent Douglas has come to this story since 5/19 is a few oddly-placed and forced mentions of [] or Sadly,No!, or links to the Alkon attack on same in posts about other topics on his blog. (An example: "And more at the "Amanda Marcotte" search. A really bad woman. Reminds me of []..." (The post was actually about John Edwards, so even the Amanda mention was kinda out of place...) No mention of "the investigation," or Tintin, no reposting of the disappeared posts, and needless to say, no big reveal... American Nihilist will keep you informed, should anything new develop. For now, though, it appears that Teh Donalde's bluster on this subject has been worth every cent you paid for it, and not a penny more...




78 comments:
Don't be an idiot. Brendan wouldn't be deleting these comments "if they're painting the bullseye on the wrong guy's back." Check the second link and you'll see Carl's comment there, plus Malaclypse verified at LGM's comments, Brendan's freakin, and Amy Alkon outed Tintin.
All that's happening is Brendan is freaked and Tintin continues to hide under the covers.
Yeah, you tell 'em, Donalde!
After all, you've never had your ubiquitous trolling deleted just because it's flat-out too ignorant, irritating or irresponsible to survive, right? RIGHT?
Ooooooooooopsy.
You missed the majority of the point, Donalde, (should we've expected any less?) but even your supposed verification is subject to question: Die Verwandlung
I'm starting a pool on Don's mental illness. I've got paranoid schizophrenic. I believe that covers his delusions of grandeur as well as "everyone who's out to get him."
I deleted a Donald comment once here. Mostly because I felt like it. It felt good.
Nihilism at it's core.
Am I unbanned again?
'Worse yet, if they're painting the bullseye on the wrong guy's back'.
Repeat. Repeat. Repeat.
Keep telling yourself that, Reppy. That's why you're nihilist. The truth doesn't sink in with you.
THIS is why Brendan deletes the posts, but duh, I got "Carl" commenting at my original Amy Alkon post. How did some any old "Carl" know to call me "Donalde"? And that any old "Carl" links to his comedy blog that links to Sadly No! That's real clever commenting when you're trying to stay anonymous.
You guys are so smart!!
Nihilists are liars. You've proved it, asshole. The jig is up. Malaclypse gave up the game!
Anything's possible, Donald Douglas... All I'm saying is you have your "facts," and the fellow(s) in question is/are suggesting you're wrong. I neither know for sure, nor care... I respect folks who want to keep their names, etc. private, just as I respect those who don't. Don't make no nevermind to me, nohow...
But um... What's with the American eocon appellation? You are aware that everyone already knows your name, right, Donalde? You've made such a big thing about being open about it, "openly standing behind what you say..." and all that crap...
No use trying to hide it, now... You might just as well call yourself Sasquatch Israel, for all the good it'll do ya... For good or ill, you are who you are, and a whole lotta folks know you by your words and deeds... ...and that name you've been using. Seems kinda odd (and a little suspicious, even) to go changing it now...
In any case, thanks for stopping by... Always a treat, Dr. Douglas...
U. R. Losing ....
I'm hammering Malaclypse in the comments at LGM for spilling the beans. Key difference here is I'm just going for the lulz, unlike you, when you had (O)CT(O)PUS (or whatever) post my information WITH an announcement of workplace jihad!!!
You progressives are just fucked up shitpile assholes.
I LOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEE messing U fuckers up!!!!!
That's why we progressives keep you around, Donalde... You're the Charlie Sheen of the political internet... You use the terms "winning" and "losing" but, as with so many other words--including some that one would think are kinda central to your job as a political science ass prof--you evidence no understanding of what they actually mean...
Dream on, sweet prince Douglas... Dream on...
One would assume Tintin does... Carl, too, if as [he/they both] say, he's not actually Tintin.
Still waiting for the missing update to this post, and a "disappeared" comment or two to come on back... Hoping the missing stuff will just slide in where it all belongs, time-wise, and not overwrite these later comments... (I don't care what happens to today's comments, much, but I'm not making any additional additions to the post itself--though I have at least one to make--until the post "updates" to it's last saved condition, just in case... (The crosspost at "WhatdISay" already has come back, fwiw...)
Brendan hasn't said anything (not that I know of, anyway), but LGM says they edited/censored/deleted Donalde's TINTIN=___!!! commentary for being against the tenets of common netiquette.
Whether accurate or "TINTIN ISREAL," one doesn't (try to) "out" a pseudononymous blogger's "real life" identity because one doesn't like what s/he posts online.
TinTin (and Carl) himself/themselves don't seem to mind, so I'm not that worried about allowing Donalde to keep spouting his/their name(s), myself...
Just realized that I have all the comments in my e-mail, so should the 5/12 comments not come back, or the 5/13 comments get wiped out when the 5/12 comments return, I can repost whatever is missing. I'll give it another 24 hours, or so...
But in response to Donaldee's "denialist" comment, allow me to repost this portion of somethin' I said yesterday:
Anything's possible, Donald Douglas... All I'm saying is you have your "facts," and the fellow(s) in question is/are suggesting you're wrong. I neither know for sure, nor care... I respect folks who want to keep their names, etc. private, just as I respect those who don't. Don't make no nevermind to me, nohow...
Posted by repsac3 to American Niiiiihilist at May 12, 2011 9:34 AM
I'm not denying a thing. I suspect Donaldee's wrong, but I can't say for sure either way, and--contrary to his claim--never have...
I simply report the competing claims, and allow those who read them to decide for themselves...
"And quit playing stupid as if this was douchey or something."
Trying to reveal offline information about a pseudonymous blogger because he hurt your widdle feewings online is "douchey," Donalde... And it's "douchey" that you need someone to tell you that. Grow up.
"Trying to destroy Amy Alkon's book sales is douchey. Photoshopping political enemies with dildos, on toilet seats, popping up out of a commode, on the floor of public restroom, along with fat jokes, etc., out the ear"
The old 'two wrongs make a right' defense... (Aren't you a father? Is that really the kind of excuse you'd accept from one of your kids? I'm betting not...) You can do better. The folks who gave Alkon bad Amazon reviews, or made the photoshops are responsible for what they did. You're responsible for what you did. The bullshit justification bit is just excuse-making. Man up, and take responsibility.
"...well, I bet some folks might be able to find some libelous material out of that fillth, which is why Carl, Brendan, and the LGM/Sadly fuckers are shitting bricks."
Put that over-inflated ego of yours in check, Dr. Douglas... No one is afraid of you, Donalde, or of your fellow wingnut bloggers (Alkon, et. al.), legally or otherwise. Your penchant for these flights of fancy, from Sasquatch isreal to Tintin isreal to your latest conspiracy, Althouse isreal, makes you a laughingstock, man... It's a shame, too, because I watched that LBCC "Facebook Revolution" video on Youtube, yesterday, and you really are capable of expressing yourself, and even disagreeing with others, without acting like an asshole. (Two hours, and you didn't call anyone a douchebag or a terroStaliNihilst, even when that guy said the Muslim Brotherhood wasn't de debil incarnate. And not a single BWAAAAAHAHA!!! I was actually very impressed.) You could be a highly respected blogger--among your collegues, and folks that matter in the education and / or political science community, I mean, rather than among your current online sycophants--if only you blogged the way you spoke at that gathering... I'm just sayin'... (Concern trolling, I know--why should I give a fuck what your collegues or those in your professional peer groups think of you?--A fair point, that... Still, you ought to at least consider it...)
In any case, I said my bit... If you want different, either be different, or visit other blogs... Thanks for stopping by, Donalde... Here's hoping you find whatever it is you're looking for...
What's douchey, 'reppy', is changing my post title, and leaving intact the actual link that proves you are a lying liar who lies a lot. Are you afraid to bring down 'Tintin' on your pointy head, if you post that name?
Even if this Carl thinger isn't the Sadly, Neutered 'Tintin', the object of widespread internet disgust, one who has wasted much of his life with clownish 'Internet Traditions', Carl's now exposed and deservedly berated as an asshole, too.
'Tintin' is on notice that his identity is close to being exposed, if it isn't already. There's huge, circling flocks of chickens what need to shit before they roost.
'Tintin' is feeling the sphincter-tightening of what this eventual exposure will bring; because of his long-term and highly-exposed juvenile treatment of hundreds of people who are better than he, he will face massive butt-hurt, and he will suffer necessary consequences. Well and good, that.
An 'Internet Tradition': expose all hidden pooh-flinging monkeys of stature sooner or later, and make 'em live up to their past.
Me, too, you say? Sure! But I'm not nearly as 'exposed' as is super-asshole 'Tintin'. I'd gladly trade my real name for his. The crowd carrying tar and pitchforks seeking him will be massive, more than the two or three whom I've pained.
Sorry, serr8ed, but The picture you used was of Jonah Goldberg... The title fits, and if anything, is more truthful than yours... All I can do is suggest you learn to cope.
As for the rest, well, nether of him (or them) seems all that concerned... Even so, I'm sure your opinion is noted.
Thanks for stoppin' by, Serr8ed...
You'll be so pleased that you brought that to my attention.
You're welcome~!
'You could be a highly respected blogger--among your collegues, and folks that matter in the education and / or political science community ...'
Er, let me clue you in, but, um, you have no authority to make such a statement, whatsoever.
I don't worry about whether I'm respected in the professional community or not, because, as you testify, I'm a professional (and clearly respected and respectable). And online? Well, the campaigns of folks contacting my college have proved who's not respected. Let's see: You and OCTO, E.D. Kain, the online athiest trolls, Alex Knepper. The police were even brought in and THE COLLEGE PLACE ON HEIGHTENED SECURITY WARNING because of actions that you folks have taken.
No, I don't worry about respect. But you should. You are a dangerous person. And I will continue to call you out, and your ilk, and prove your evil to the world.
Kinda foolish that you didn't know it was your friend Jonah in the first place, Serr8ed... Says something about you, it does...
Glad you gave yourself a happy by photoshopping "me," as well... Gotta get those thrills where you can, I guess... Hope it does everything for you you're wishin' for... I'll not spoil it for you by giving you the facts... As with CarlTintin, better to just let you folks keep wackin' off to your "victories..."
"I'm LOVIN' THIS!!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!"
Another day, another happy. Play with it until it hurts, for all I care. (But at least give it some thought... I hear tell you can go blind from "lovin' it" too often... Bwaaahaha.)
"you have no authority to make such a statement, whatsoever."
Never said I did, old man... Keep on keepin' on, if this is the image you want to put out into your world... As I said, I'm not all that invested in your future... (I still think it's a damned shame, though... Pitiful, really.)
"And I will continue to call you out, and your ilk, and prove your evil to the world."
Right back atcha, there, Dr. Douglas... Right back atcha...
Heh. Doesn't say a thing about me; just about Tintin's shitty photoshoppery 'skillset'. Take a better look at my quick-and-dirty improvement, compared to the original. That punk can't hold a candle.
Can't wait to get hold of Tintin's face-photo. I'll have him emerging from goatse like a greasy moth from a cutworm pupae.
You're a legend in your own mind... But as long as it gives you a happy, Spanky, you just keep right on pullin' that little ol' thing.
One would assume Tintin does... Carl, too, if as [he/they both] say, he's not actually Tintin.
Mea culpa, Reppy. That's Latin for "my bad," right? I was looking from the wrong angle.
Photoshopping political enemies with dildos, on toilet seats, popping up out of a commode, on the floor of public restroom, along with fat jokes, etc., out the ear ... well, I bet some folks might be able to find some libelous material out of that filth, which is why Carl, Brendan, and the LGM/Sadly fuckers are shitting bricks.
Don, I'm pretty sure that no one on your enemies list is shitting bricks over this. You and Alkon and Goldberg and whoever else the Sadlies attack have made themselves public figures. I believe for a successful libel charge you might need more than a photoshop of you coming out of a toilet.
You live by the sword, you die by the sword. You throw brickbats from your blog and then whine when people throw them back (more successfully). If you want to sue them I'm sure there's a judge somewhere that could use a good laugh.
For the record:
And all of this begs the question of why I'm suddenly banned at Brendan's ...
Untrue. No one is banned from commenting on my blog. That I have deleted individual comments I considered inappropriate is not the same as being banned.
Also: it's raises the question, not "begs."
"That's Latin for "my bad," right?"
Kevin, this is America... We don't speak no dead foreign languages here in America. We're like, exceptional, and shit, yo.
"Also: it's raises the question, not 'begs.'"
Brendan's comment raised a/the question of usage for me, so I took a quick look: Begs the Question : Grammar Girl :: Quick and Dirty Tips ™
As GG says, there is some argument about whether common usage (basically, people constantly and consistently misusing the term) has made 'begging the Q' synonymous with 'raising the Q.' Some certainly will say that it's become an accepted "mistake," and thus perfectly fine. Thus I'm willing to cut DD some slack on his usage.
On the other hand, I have to agree with GG's conclusion. Begging the question has a specific meaning, and we shouldn't allow it to be watered down or lost just because folks so often misused the term as to make that misuse acceptable. While it may turn out to be a lost cause, one should always use the terms as they were intended, and inform those folks who use them incorrectly. So Brendan's right, too... The phrase DD was lookin' for does seem to've been "raises the question," not "begs the question."
All hail Grammar Girl... I do loves my English language, even when I screw with it, intentionally or otherwise...
Brendan, Racist Repsac = Both Wrong:
'Many English speakers correctly assume "begs the question" means "raises the question" and use it accordingly: for example, "this year's deficit is half a trillion dollars, which begs the question: how are we ever going to balance the budget?" With rare exception, experts deem such usage incorrect. Those experts are mistaken.'
I'm sorry, Donalde, but did you just blindly quote from Wikipedia to us? (sans link, of course)
And did you really not comprehend that part of my comment where I said "As GG says, there is some argument about whether common usage (basically, people constantly and consistently misusing the term) has made 'begging the Q' synonymous with 'raising the Q.' Some certainly will say that it's become an accepted "mistake," and thus perfectly fine. Thus I'm willing to cut DD some slack on his usage," or are you just ignoring the meaning of what I posted there so as to say I'm wrong, in spite of what I posted?
I said there are experts who say your usage was acceptable, which is just what your Wikipedia quote says. Others, including Grammar Girl and I, disagree that your usage should be acceptable, but we both acknowledge there are folks who say it is.
Maybe you'd prefer to hear it from GGT's own site, in her own words:
"In fact, that wrong usage is so common some people will argue it's not an error anymore (7). But I'm firmly in the camp that believes it's worthwhile to stick to the formal definition. There are plenty of phrases writers can use when they mean "makes me wonder" or "raises the question." There's no hole in the English language that needs to be filled, so there's no reason to use begs the question improperly." - Begs the Question : Grammar Girl
No consolation prize, Dr Douglas, but thanks for playing, anyway...
I'm sorry, Donalde, but did you just blindly quote from Wikipedia to us? (sans link, of course)
No. He plagiarized an outdated version of Wikipedia.
Pretty funny that a "college professor" would appeal to Wikipedia as an unimpeachable authority, too.
I should have known better than to point out more than one error at a time to Donalde, though. I should have realized that in his typically dishonest fashion, he'd ignore the more important point because he had no answer for it.
OK, that was weird... I went back to Wikipedia to check Brendan's statement, and got a page with a different bit under "Modern Usage," which I wish I'd copied...
As soon as I went to my history and reopened the Wikipedia page I looked at last night--the one from whence Donalde cribbed his reposte--the page with the different language closed/was replaced by the one with the old language... ...and I cannot get the one with the "new" language back.
I did however find this site, which also says what me and that Grammar Girl believe:
Beg The Question // Get it right.
(Geeky I know, but I love the ins and outs of the English language--even as I mangle it, sometimes.)
See here for the vandalized version of that Wikipedia page and here for the comparison with the current version.
OK... Now I see... It's Donalde's quote, minus that last "Those experts are mistaken." line.
My bad. (And Donalde's, too, I'd say...)
Were I conspiratorial, I'd claim that Donalde edited Wikipedia himself, just to prove his point. As I'm not that kinda guy, I'll just assume CarlTintin did it, to embarrass teh Donalde.
WIKIPEDIA ISREAL!!!
I did look up the geolocation of the IP address associated with the vandalized version. Sadly, it was not in the greater Long Beach, CA, area, where Donalde lives.
Oh, sorry. Did I put personal information out on a blog comment, gratuitously? I hope Donalde doesn't get too mad about that!
"I did look up the geolocation of the IP address associated with the vandalized version.
More proof that it was CarlTintin... That cat can't be geolocated; he is everywhere!!!
(Killed a hundred men with flames shot out of his ass, he did... Lasers for eyes, too. Took down blogger, just to piss off Ann Althouse. His mother has a tattoo on her arm that says "Son." All facts. I read 'em on the intertubes.)
I played, too...
(I wonder if my comment being deleted will "prove" Carl really is--or isn't--Tintin...
These questions and more, folks...)
BINGO!!!!!!!!.
"Rule #6 Edit (originally posted May 13, 2011 3:10 PM)
Donald Douglas said...
Reppy, you idiot, I thought you said you WEREN'T a denialist. The documentation of CARL [jung] AS TINTIN is there. Tintin's doin' the pushback at the link you provide. And all of this begs the question of why I'm suddenly banned at Brendan's (a close online buddy to Tintin) AND why Lawyers, Guns and Murder is feverishly flushing my my blog comments down the memory hole!
BWHAHAHHAHAHA!!!
Rule #6 Edit: (originally posted May 13, 2011 5:35 PM)
Kevin Robbins said...
Who cares if Tintin is or isn't Carl [sagan]? Don, are you sure your comments weren't just deleted for being obnoxious?
Rule #6 Edit: (originally posted May 14, 2011 12:25 AM)
Donald Douglas said...
'I suspect Donaldee's wrong..."
God, you're stupid. Carl [santana]'s now threatening a lawsuit. He's tweeting back and forth to Tintin as if the were friends. He's claiming libel, but of course that's a no go, since libel requires someone making false statements, recklessly false, which I am not. I've cited Amy Alkon repeatedly and shown the trail of comments, starting with Carl at his Blogger profile a couple of weeks ago.
And quit playing stupid as if this was douchey or something. Trying to destroy Amy Alkon's book sales is douchey. Photoshopping political enemies with dildos, on toilet seats, popping up out of a commode, on the floor of public restroom, along with fat jokes, etc., out the ear ... well, I bet some folks might be able to find some libelous material out of that filth, which is why Carl, Brendan, and the LGM/Sadly fuckers are shitting bricks.
And you are NOT one to talk, workplace harassment sponsor douchebag!!
Asshole. You too, exDLB, you prick. Get a freakin' life, jackwagon dilrod.
Donald Douglas said...
'Man up, and take responsibility.'
When did I not?
I'm LOVIN' THIS!!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
It's only "douchey" when conservatives throw progressive shit back in their faces. You are a hypocrite. And a stalking asshat loser. (But everyone knows that already.)
CARL [marx] IS OUT!!!
You gonna delete that, RACIST REPSAC = NIHILIST CASPER?
[R3: Apparently yes, I am. One of your potential victims asked, so the fun's over, lazydick. Just be glad that--for continuity's sake alone--I'm doing all this editing and reposting, rather than dropping the comments entirely.]
Or, are you going to have the netroots contact Donald Berz?
YOU DEFINE DOUCHE!!!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH!!!!
Rule #6 Edit: (Originally posted May 14, 2011 8:14 PM -- And I missed one... The previous comment (CARL [marx]) was originally posted May 14, 2011 12:49 PM )
Donald Douglas said...
'You live by the sword, you die by the sword. You throw brickbats from your blog and then whine when people throw them back (more successfully). If you want to sue them I'm sure there's a judge somewhere that could use a good laugh.'
exDLB you idiot, Carl [hussain obama] is threatening lawsuits. More on that later. I'm throwing this shit back in your face, and you guys attack, make threats, and attempt to take people down. Fuck you, asshole shitpile.
Rule #6 Edit: (originally posted May 15, 2011 11:10 AM)
Donald Douglas said...
God, that is hilarious!!
Of course it's a Wikipedia quote. I could have told you that, you idiots. It's a blog comment, not a research paper. Wikipedia's an encyclopedia. And even more hilarious is that not only that someone changed Wikipedia to reflect common usage BUT you allege that I'd do it AND you check ISP? No, Brendan, I don't live in Long Beach. I work in Long Beach. So if you've been checking my ISP to the Carl [yastrzemski] comments you've deleted you be able to figure that out. Try teh Google, stupid.
"Beg the question" in common usage is "raise the question." Although some aren't happy:
While descriptivists and other such laissez-faire linguists are content to allow the misconception to fall into the vernacular, it cannot be denied that logic and philosophy stand to lose an important conceptual label should the meaning of BTQ become diluted to the point that we must constantly distinguish between the traditional usage and the erroneous "modern" usage. This is why we fight.'
What's best is I don't care!!
Rule #6 Edit: (May 15, 2011 11:13 AM)
Donald Douglas said...
Oh, I'm going to mention Carl [kent douglas] on BJKeefe and watch it get deleted. It's a new Internet tradition and really fun! It's "The Carl [douglas kent] search the commenters ISP" game!!
Rule #6 Edit: (May 15, 2011 11:31 AM)
Donald Douglas said...
Okay, you dolt's.
There's a whole website on BTQ. Didn't link only because I'm lazy: http://begthequestion.info/
But I'll link this, my comment just now at Brendan's blog. And I'll link the screencap.
The "Carl [repsac three] search the commenters ISP" is da bomb!
You freakin' commie loser are da best!!
Don't change!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!
Rule #6 Edit (May 15, 2011 12:01 PM)
Donald Douglas said...
FOR THE RECORD:
I'm not banned at BJ Keefe's, (or so says Brendan). Only comments mentioning CARL [david chapman] get banned, to cover for Tintin at Sadly No!!
Of course, RACIST REPSAC = CASPER has long been banned at AmPow. He refuses to respect the ban and routinely attempts to publish comments there, which with rare exception are deleted.
And in this post Racist Reppy has a problem with the "netiquette" of posting Carl [tin fisk]'s information, etc., and he does it by lying about it to boot: "that employer information was already online ..."
(NOT ONLY HYPOCRITICAL BUT) WRONG RACIST REPSAC: Everything I've posted is simply documentation of things that ARE ALREADY ONLINE, duh.
Still, I gotta admit a special ROTFLMFAO at Carl "Young & Hung" [sanjia]."
That is too fucking good.
But really, stop lying Repsac Racist. This whole post AND thread proves how sleazy and dishonest are the lot of you, assholes.
Rule #6 Edit: (May 15, 2011 3:07 PM)
repsac3 said...
Brendan has his reasons for not allowing certain comments on his blog, and apparently, Donalde has his, too...
(Funny how Donalde's reasons are perfectly justified, while Brendan's are evidence of a conspiracy.)
"Reppy has a problem with the "netiquette" of posting Carl [crawford]'s information"
Incorrect again, Dr Douglas. What I said was, LGM cited netiquette (or "a violation of the principles of Online Integritude," to be precise) as a reason for their editing this unproven allegation from Donalde's comments. I had no problem with their doing that, or with Donalde's continuing to shout the name over here, as long as Carl/Tintin ("he," or "they") don't mind. And judging by the fact that he/they is also using the name in question in his/their own posts, I'm taking it on faith that he/they don't.
"lying about it to boot: "that employer information was already online ..."
That was not a lie. Anyone interested can google Donald's name and pretty darn quickly find where he is employed, and the name of his department head and "company" president, snail and e-mail addresses, phone numbers and all. It was true in 2009 (or whenever this damned thing first happened) as well.
"Everything I've posted is simply documentation of things that ARE ALREADY ONLINE, duh."
Donalde does indeed have me there... ...though I submit that there is a difference between quoting the site of the institution where Dr Douglas is actually and admittedly employed (which was done not by me, but by another fellow who once blogged at AmNi), and quoting an equally crazy and ethically-challenged wingnut spouting her conspiracy theories as to Tintin's "real" identity--which has been denied by both Tintin and the fellow named as his "real" identity, btw... (...and those denials, in turn, being cited as "proof" that it's all really "ISREAL" true, somehow.)
Of course, YMMV...
That's it. We clear of the name [you know... but that we ain't sayin']
All further mentions on site will be deleted on sight (unless we see some reason to edit & post 'em, which'll be at our discretion.)
Like I said, I was cool with it as long as one / both / all three of the parties involved were. Now that one of 'em's said otherwise, I'm not. Make of that what you will (which in Donalde's case (note super-secret spelling) will likely be MONDO TINTIN ISREAL CONSPIRACY time... ...and goodie for him if it is, as long as it isn't, here.)
That's some phenomenal editting, Reppy. Really enjoyed all those Carls. In case you need anymore may I suggest Carl Paladino (we hardly knew ye), Carlsbad (to the bone) Caverns and of course Carl "the Truth" Williams.
Wait...you mean Donalde gets upset that his employer's name is bandied about because someone might contact them?
Gee...that would, you know, suck.
Oh, and Donalde?
It's brought.
Y'know... I was kinda wondering what happened to all that bravado, and why Dr. Douglas suddenly folded like a cheap suit and deleted all his posts. Have a feeling there's more than meets the eye, and I hope the facts can and do come out.
On the other hand, I am awaiting the big reveal... Suspect it'll be Capone's vault all over again, but still... Is Tintin really... Tintin? Is Carl really an actor, or is Tintin? Is anyone from Belgium? These questions and more... Will they ever be answered? Or is this whole episode going to be conveniently mothballed and memory-holed, the same way that anti-Semitic Sasquatch was?
The whole world is waiting... and watching...
Google cache version of at least one of the deleted posts still exists at this moment.
It's really amazing that he deleted the posts at this point, though. Anyone who cared already has screen shots of them, and everybody else, well, didn't care in the first place.
But maybe, this being Monday, his superiors at work had something to say, hmmm?
I wasn't gonna bring that up, but no, the disappeared posts are not lost... Screenshots and text/links of all of 'em, I think... (I've learned my lesson...)
You might add this to the collection, if you haven't already. It shows him linking to a post of his, which now, amazingly, can't be found.
And probably a few others around that time.
Donalde has now overtaken Larry Johnson and the "whitey" tape,* hasn't he?
I'm on the verge of obtaining the mother of all tips on Tintin's identity.
* (Can't imagine that you've forgotten, but just in case, see here.)
Whitey do that, Brendan?
Can anyone say?
(I think Donalde pulled those earlier posts because they very clearly allege that [] is Tintin, and he now realizes that that is a damned lie. Whether it's libel, I don't know, but it is certainly no less crazy than his "SASQUATCH ISREAL anti-semitism allegations, pulled and flushed down the memory hole (well, on his blog, anyway) in very much the same way.)
For all his tough talk, he'd rather pull his shit down and pretend he never said it, than stand behind his words.
Rule #6 Edit/reply:
Donalde sez (May 17, 2011 1:26 PM):
"A little careless on your scrubbing there, RacistRepsac3. I've screencapped this comment, where you indicate that an alleged victim wanted his name scrubbed from your threads."
That wasn't careless. It was intentional. If you actually read the comments, I plainly said what I was "scrubbing," why I didn't do so earlier, and why I am, now. There is nothing deceitful or hidden, here...
Yes, someone asked another blogger (not me, by the by), to please remove somethin' from his/her blog, I saw that request, and I took it upon myself to remove that same thing here, too, which is kinda what I said I'd do, anyway, when I said "as long as it's ok by them, it's ok by me." It stopped being ok with one of them. Simple to understand, and no great conspiracy involved.
"Gee, I wonder who that could be, ahhh, [] maybe?"
Maybe...
"You gonna scrub this?'
Yes. Just like I said I would, in the comment above. This really shouldn't be surprising to you. I'm doing just what I said I was gonna do.
"It'll be screencapped."
I'd expect nothing less. What it won't be, is posted here.
"What are you a coward or something?"
No, I don't think so... I think I'm abiding by the wishes of a guy you're attacking--(attacking for no particular reason other than you can, I might add... Even you should understand by now that it's quite likely Alkon is just fuckin' wrong, and thus you are just fuckin' wrong, and the [] mystery man isn't the mystery man you think he is, and that that in fact, up until this crazy, bullshit incident, you've never had any contact at all with said [] mystery man.)--which, as I've said a few times in this comment already, is exactly what I said I'd do.
"I pulled my posts pending further investigation."
That'd be admirable, if you weren't still making the same stupid allegation, and still attacking the [] mystery man with it.
"[]'s threatening libel, and of course I believe everything to be true, and I'll restore everything shortly."
I think I said somewhere that I have no clue whether or not it's actual legal libel, but if he's got lawyers who say it's a case worth pursuing, more power to him.
But that's my point. If you still believe everything to be true, you should keep it all posted, and stand behind your bullshit allegations. What you do says alot more than what you say, here...
"And why not? I've got all you idiots scurrying like rats. Do rats do damage control?"
Scurrying like rats, being responsible and responsive folks... I can see where those concepts might confuse you, given some of the bullshit you post...
"As soon as I confirm with my sources all my posts identifying [] will be reposted."
I'll believe it when I see it. Hope you name those sources, though... Disembodied voices in your head (those e-mail "sources" you like to anonymously quote, telling everyone how great you and your blog is, fer'instance) don't count.
"So again, who's cowardly? Coward."
I say it's the cowardly coward who deleted his blog posts--posts he says he still believes in, but took down, anyway, rather than standing behind them, and letting the chips fall as they may.
YMMV, of course...
Thanks for stopping by Dr Douglas...
Fuckhead doesn't even remember what he said.
"Libel suit". *chuckling*
Rule #6 Edit:
Donald Douglas said (May 17, 2011 5:40 PM)
'I say it's the cowardly coward who deleted his blog posts--posts he says he still believes in, but took down, anyway, rather than standing behind them, and letting the chips fall as they may.'
You are a truly stupid and genuinely evil man (redundant point that bears repeating anyway).
If someone accuses you of libel you correct the allegations. I'll post more when I know it, although you've got the line of argument wrong. You should step back and think about what YOU'RE alleging. And [] is [ ] a.k.a. []. That is not in doubt. Nothing now posted at my blog goes beyond that, since that can be proved beyond reasonable doubt, and I've gathered the evidence. Besides, [] doesn't contest that. What he contests is that he's more intimately involved at Sadly No! than he'd like people to find out. And when I have more on that I'll post it.
But since your life is all about double standards and hypocrisy, hear it from someone else:
'The Sadly No blog is a monument to immaturity and narcissism. That's fine too, as the Slackoisie need somewhere to go during the day since they clearly will never be employable adults. But to engage in this smear campaign against Amy because they disagree with her views, and to do so in such an overt (and childish) manner for the purpose of harming her financially by faking negative reviews, rather than challenging her ideas, is total garbage.
My guess is that my politics are far closer to those of the kiddies at Sadly No, and yet I am disgusted that these children have no more useful way to spend their time than try to harm someone for disagreeing with them.'
You should be ATTACKING Sadly No! as a hate site, not enabling the hate and ensconsing yourself in the comments there.
You are an evil man.
And fuck you []. You're shitting bricks folks are on your trail, 52 year-old dirtbag buttfuck.
Talk about redundant...
Every site that disagrees with you is a hate site, just like everyone who disagreed with you became nihilists...
Get over yourself, Donalde. You ain't half the man you imagine yourself to be, and your posts (scrubbed and unscrubbed) and comments prove it for all the world to see.
Your schtick is as predictable as it's ever been...
'Get over yourself, Donalde.'
Project much, Mr. Denialist?
Sure. Sure. I'm nothing much. Really, I'm a shitpile, of which you spend your every waking minute monitoring, watching me on LBCC YouTubes, linking them to LGM ...
Damn, you're sick fucker. Shit. Mofo stalker creep. Asshole too!
Just perfect for Sadly No!! ...
'The Sadly No blog is a monument to immaturity and narcissism ... I am disgusted that these children have no more useful way to spend their time than try to harm someone for disagreeing with them.'
Pathetic Manchild Racist Repsac Loser3 = Casper.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!
And you don't have to COWARDLY DELETE since there's no mention of [...].
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!
Pathetic Manchild Racist Repsac Loser3 = Casper.
Don't change!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
OMG!!!!
PERFECT FOR THE SADLY MAN CHILD RACIST REP-LOSER = JAMES CASPER!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
EPIC LULZ!! ---> BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Don't change, ever!!!
THANKS IN ADVANCE!! BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
ROTFLMFAO!! ROTFLMFAO!!
Like I said... Predictable.
That's why we keep you around, Dr. Douglas...
You parody and expose yourself for who and what you really are better than anyone else ever could...
Thanks for stopping by...
If someone accuses you of libel you correct the allegations.
If only you had, Donalde, it wouldn't be brung.
If only you had done even the slightest little bit of legwork, you would have discovered that in no way shape or form could I be TinTin.
But soft, son, I never accused you of libel. YOU accused YOURself of it. I have no problem with that.
But notice: you decided to "prove" that I was TinTin...by revealing my personal information.
Tell me, Donalde, how was that proving anything other than what Malaclypse said on day one: I exist? You and Arnold have done nothing to prove the allegation that I am TinTin except post very sketchy circumstantial evidence that has been refuted and rebutted and proven wrong six ways to Sunday.
What purpose was served in outting me, an innocent blogger who has done nothing to you?
I should say "had," I guess.
Donalde, I suggested you speak to a lawyer. I reiterate that suggestion here. Perhaps Glenn Reynolds, you seem friendly with him, you should show him your evidence and show him your posts and ask him what possible liability you have
Hey! He might even be liberal about it and consult with you for free!
I've got paranoid schizophrenic.
My medical consultant thinks its borderline personality disorder, so I'll take a piece of this bet
Oh brother.
YOU're a (lowlife sickfuck) liar, Carl. (And did I mention world class loser?)
YOU've threatened litigation since I first posted on Amy's PJTV clip.
Sorry load-pants man child, you lying sick fuck. You've got jack of a lawsuit. No one is "outed" by posting publicly available government records. Facebook and Twitter? LinkedIn? All publicly available. On top of that, absence of malice, remember, dickload? Reckless disregard? Sorry chump. YOU're out of luck. YOU should talk to a lawyer, or if you have, he/she must be fucking shitty. You will be laughed out of court, hard ... or, well, perhaps "hung" is the better word. Frankly, you fool no one. You're all bluster and your sick delusions of liability amount to squat. And your game is up. My investigation is almost complete. As I said before, I'M LOVIN' THIS!!
Whoo hoo!!!!!!!!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!
And fuck you, and the Repsac Scumbag3 you rode in on.
YOU've threatened litigation since I first posted on Amy's PJTV clip.
Actually, I thanked you for posting it and bringing it to my attention and mentioned the possibility OF GETTING ROGER SIMON'S MONEY
Donalde...you're a pissant little assistant "professor" at a Community College. I spend your weekly salary on lunch in a month. You aren't worth the retainer I'd pay.
No one is "outed" by posting publicly available government records. Facebook and Twitter? LinkedIn? All publicly available. On top of that, absence of malice, remember, dickload?
Um, Donalde? Sorry, you outted my personal information. Period.
BECAUSE you did it with malice, by attempting to prove that I was TinTin and the things you said about me. Do you even remember some of what you posted? You deleted it, yes, and scrubbed the Google cache.
*smile* But not quick enough.
Well, you're about to be reminded of what you said. And hey, Donalde?
It doesn't matter if I win or lose. What does matter is watching you sweat. All I can say is, you had better have public records to prove whatever you think you have on me.
I know what you think you have. When you go there?
You're mine.
Of course, you already know you invaded my privacy and you already know why you invaded it and that you have a major legal exposure, because you took those posts down and made sure they were cleared from Google's cache.
So Donalde, this is a very brave front you've put up here, but it's still just whistling past the graveyard, hoping the ghosts don't come and get you.
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
I'll be seeing you...around...DD ;-)
Post a Comment