On a recent visit to our less than humble abode good friend of AmNi, Donald, left this comment:
Not sure if you'll delete this, but linked today to Sadly, and hadn't been over there in a while. Saw this comment from one of your buddies, and thought it reflective of exactly the kind of people you are. Yeah, I'll cuss and kid down to your level, and spam the shit out of your comments, but there really is a level of depravity to the lot of you that is simply incomprehensible. I hope you're proud of yourself, what you're doing, and who you're hanging with. Shocking, really.
He is upset about a photo linked to by one of those “disgusting perverts” at Sadly No. I, being at least mildly perverted, enjoyed the photo which showed someone dressed as Sasquatch having intercourse (they was fucking) doggy style (oddly enough) with a woman. BTW, Sasquatch is real and really hung.
Hey, different folks get off on different strokes. Some like furry sex. Some like voyeurism (cough, Erin Andrews, cough). But, in case things get too racy here or at the homes of some the bloggers we’re “hanging with” I went out, and at no small expense, purchased this genuine antique fainting couch just for you Don. Make yourself comfy.
Nothing is too good for our friends!
And just a reminder! Rapture Party is this Saturday on the river of blood. The rider on the black horse is bringing famine and on the white horse, death. Everyone else can just bring a casserole or some dogs, burgers, salads, whatever. Mix it up.
![[photo]](http://rimstation.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/images/IMG_0501_2.220102653_std.JPG){kind=link}
42 comments:
Aim for the big, red, button: Welcome to Instant Rimshot (No dirty thoughts there, Donalde... It's just a sound effect.)
Can I get a ROTFLMFAO?
Or, a BWAAAHAHA, at least?
"...doggy style (oddly enough) with a woman..."
Wait... Are you saying Sasquatch is gay, or that his technique is odd, given his "missing link" kingdom, phylum, class (etc) classification?
I'm just wondering whether the big guy successfully went through Brit milah, given his apparent Jewish heritage... ...or whether he killed the mohel who had the chutzpah to try it...
(Where else but on the internet, would one have cause to ponder such things? Teh intertubes are a blessing, they are... A mitzvah, if you will...)
Oy, you're just being meshugah now.
I'm sorry... Having recently discovered that I may be LGM's SEK--and thus may be Jewish--I wanted to get in a little practice on my Yiddish idioms... (Hebrew being WAAAAAY too difficult for a beginner/convert like me.)
I hope you understand...
Two more things...
1) Kevin: I missed the "Rapture Party" invite at the bottom of the post, up till now... Give yourself another nihilosnack right off the bat, and you're getting an extra ration of toilet paper this week, too... ...assuming we're not, y'know...
2) It's all fun and games until someone pokes an eye out. (A phrase which undoubtedly opens another whole can o' worms prolly best left sealed). That said, I also commented on the pretty pichers, perhaps a bit more seriously, here.
Reppy, mazel tov on your new found Judaism. So, you are SEK? I'm glad you're not John Casper or are all three of you one and the same? Need a scorecard here. Hope I don't find out that I am actually Donald.
The Rapture Party thing was an afterthought which I was too lazy to give its own posting so it just got added to this one. So your powers of observation are not necessarily lacking.
Can't wait for the real Judgment Day so I can start explaining these blasphemous little jokes. "Well you see, God, it was funny at the time."
'Hey, different folks get off on different strokes. Some like furry sex. Some like voyeurism (cough, Erin Andrews, cough).'
Wrong. I posted Erin Andrews for traffic, simple as that. Took a lot of heat for it ... still taking heat for it. I made a mistake. You guys? You cowards hide behind fake names and make sick unsubstantiated allegations of pedophilia, etc., for the purpose of destroying your political enemies. Never a correction. Never a retraction and admission of wrong doing. But it's all for the record to show WHAT you guys do. It's sick and diabolical. (The supportive e-mails and comments thanking me for exposing your freaks are coming in. I'll be posting those as well.)
And my comments are never held in spam. They always go through, except for last night when Reppy was takin' 'em down, or something? Who knows? He's a freakin' liar and asswipe hypocrite. But again, Sadly No! is the waystation for the demented left's man children like yourself:
'The Sadly No blog is a monument to immaturity and narcissism. That's fine too, as the Slackoisie need somewhere to go during the day since they clearly will never be employable adults. But to engage in this smear campaign against Amy because they disagree with her views, and to do so in such an overt (and childish) manner for the purpose of harming her financially by faking negative reviews, rather than challenging her ideas, is total garbage.
My guess is that my politics are far closer to those of the kiddies at Sadly No, and yet I am disgusted that these children have no more useful way to spend their time than try to harm someone for disagreeing with them.'
Well, what do you know? Comments coming right through. Repsac3's a liar and not to be trusted. The investigation continues ...
Donald, you are the most brilliant parodist of a wingnut on the web. I love how you manage to do it so completely without breaking character. Who else could write a line like:
I've thought about this a lot, actually. At this point, I'm backing Bachmann unless Palin throws her hat into the ring.
Keep up the good work and sorry about Donald Trump choosing mammon over the good of the nation.
Oh, and sorry I forgot that you were just posting cheesecake for the blog hits. Good luck nailing that lying liar pants on fire Repsac. Don't tell him I said that, tho.
"And my comments are never held in spam. They always go through, except for last night when Reppy was takin' 'em down, or something?"
Donalde, I understand you dig the conspiracy, but the simplest answer is generally the correct one. You have been caught in the spam filter here at least once before. Here's a link to what happened the last time.
Yeah, that's right... I reposted your damned comment myself, before realizing it was in the spam filter and releasing it, too.
The fact that you could post a different comment today isn't proof that the one you posted four times last night wasn't filtered. Not to state the obvious (or what SHOULD be obvious, anyway) but it's a different comment, with different content. (And now that I approved it, it's entirely likely that whatever it was that caused it to get caught last night won't trip the filter, next time. (Read the directions--The sentence that starts "You can help improve..." specifically. The more you use it, the more the filter "learns.")
Look, Donalde... I suppose there's no way that I can prove to your satisfaction that your comments were flagged as spam last night... Everyone who has ever used blogger can evaluate your story and mine, and come to their own conclusions, I guess...
But I will ask you this: If it wasn't caught by a spam filter (or moderation, the announcement of which you would've seen when you posted the comments), how did I make your initial comment appear, under your own name and with your picture, at the exact time you posted it?
Occam's razor. The simplest answer is the most plausible one, Donalde... That's all I can tell you...
'Look, Donalde... I suppose there's no way that I can prove to your satisfaction that your comments were flagged as spam last night...'
Not my problem, bitch! You're a liar and a racist sleazebag.
Beside the point, anyway. Neither you nor dirtbag exDLB have a response to this: ''The Sadly No blog is a monument to immaturity and narcissism ...'
Losers.
The investigation continues ...
Sadly No!
"Wrong. I posted Erin Andrews for traffic, simple as that. Took a lot of heat for it ... still taking heat for it. I made a mistake."
Damned straight, you did. I'm glad to see you admit it.
"You guys? You cowards hide behind fake names and make sick unsubstantiated allegations of pedophilia, etc., for the purpose of destroying your political enemies."
1) I have never alleged pedophilia against you. I do agree with SEK that some of your Rule 5 postage is inappropriate for a blog you suggest to your students, but that's up to you, your students, and your college.
2) Funny, that I made that very same "destroying your political enemies" charge against you, like 12 hours ago (SEE: Added #10).
You're like an echo chamber... Whatever you get accused of, you turn around and accuse your accuser of. You'd be saying my blog was inappropriate for my students, if only you could establish that I actually HAD students. (Of course, you could always make it up...)
"(The supportive e-mails and comments thanking me for exposing your freaks are coming in. I'll be posting those as well.)"
Will any of 'em be in the writer's own voice, with the author's name attached, or is this gonna be another episode of "A supporter who wishes to remain anonymous e-mailed me privately to say..."?
I'm not saying these folks don't exist. They might, or they might not. I am saying your quotes of their private, anonymous e-mails is all but worthless as proof of anything to anyone aside you. That said, I look forward to reading these testimonials to your wonderfulness, from wherever they may come...
Re: May 19, 2011 6:12 PM
Everyone who has ever used blogger can evaluate your story and mine, and come to their own conclusions, I guess...
'I'm glad to see you admit it ...'
The mistake, you idiot, was not realizing the likely backlash. CBS played clips of the video on national TV. No apologies for going for traffic, as I said at the time. And you? Well, you never take responsibility. Nothing is too depraved for you. If it was, you wouldn't defend these people, the Sadly demons.
A longtime reader wrote (the same one you engaged here previously) on Sadly No! and [...]: 'Honestly, Donald, there just has to be some way you can legally stop those guys. To me, it seems like that would be a defamation of character lawsuit, and libel, since it's all in print....and obviously it seems to be a deliberate effort on their part to harm your reputation ...
I don't have to tell you that there is real evil in the world, men without conscience, no love, nor respect for their fellow man. You will just have to hold onto your faith as never before, and get through this.'
Amusing Bunny wrote, in my comment thread today: 'I'm glad you take them on, and expose them for the scum they are! Take it easy Don, and keep fighting.'
Kevin Willmann wrote on Facebook: 'Hey Donald! What's happening? ... That's some sick stuff. Be Careful!'
And of course, Sadly No! is a blog designed explicitly to destroy political enemies. I'm fighting back. Your stupid response (that I'm copying?) is wrong, self-serving, and lame. There is no equivalence between me and the Sadly fucks. The question is why are you covering for them? Why are you deleting so and so's name? That makes you an accomplice. You're enabling the hate.
You will disagree, but that's not all, and I'm spreading the word about you and your and Sadly demons ... Time to change ... There is evil in the world, and you embody it ...
"''The Sadly No blog is a monument to immaturity and narcissism ...'
My response: The guy's welcome to his opinion. I'm not so sure he's not wrong either, some of the time... Yes, SadlyNaughts can be childish, sometimes.
But I hope you're not suggesting that the fact that you found a guy who believes what you believe is PROOF that either of you is right... It's his (and your) opinion, not fact... And Donalde, it's an opinion worth every cent you paid for it, just as all opinions are... (Sometimes I think you have trouble telling the difference between the two.) ((And for the record, that's my opinion. I am not alleging it is a fact.))
@Racist Reppy: WTF? One guy? I've cited three who commented me directly, but I could give you 3,000 or 3 million, and you wouldn't care --- you're nihilist!!!!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHHAH!!
Respond to previous comment, idiot, or quit jerking me around, geek loser fail.
First off, Dr. Douglas, you seem confused as to who's on whose blog, here. Chances are pretty good I'll respond to your comments, no matter how inane some of 'em may be, but if I choose not to respond, you're just going to have to learn to cope with the fact that you're being ignored. It's bound to happen, sometimes...
Second, you seem not to be paying attention, again. I friggin' well quoted the one guy I was responding to, from a PREVIOUS comment of yours, and for the record, I was doing so at pretty much the same time you were quoting your friends and their accolades. If you took a second to look back, you might even see where you called on me to do it, saying that neither Kevin or I had a response to that very quote. In response to that, I erb... responded.
Try harder to keep up, Donalde... You're making this too easy, Donalde...
As for the three accolades of you, the same answer about opinion vs fact applies, I guess. I'm sincerely happy that you have folks who believe you're doing the Lord's work, or whatever, and I'm sure you find it gratifying to be thusly appreciated, but Donalde... Just because they feel as they do, it doesn't make their opinions of you any more objectively factual or valid than my opinion of you. It's all a matter of whose opinions you choose to take to heart, and whose opinions you don't, and nothing more.
Think of it this way... If you're a fan of horror flicks, the opinions of a film critic who can't stand horror flicks is going to be damned near worthless to you. A given opinion is only going to be valuable, if one respects and agrees with that person's opinions in general. It's not really all that surprising that I don't see eye to eye with the folks saying you're wonderful, because, well, because I disagree with 'em. I wouldn't expect you to take my opinion of you all that seriously either, for the same reason.
I did think the opinion discussing liable and defamation were interesting, given what you've said previously on that subject. I have no clue either way, but I'd guess that you'd have as much trouble with the folks you tried to sue as you believe they'd have trying to sue you. And as far as I'm concerned, so far, anyway, it's all just blogging. Photoshops, name calling, and folks expressing ridiculous opinions about each other seem par for the course. It seems to be a self-correcting medium, where folks who act like assholes get exposed as being assholes, by their online antics, alone. Lawsuits over online name calling seem kinda over the top, in my humble... ...no matter who's filing them.
BWAAAHAHA, Donalde... BWAAAHAHA.
Gee, Donalde...you're calling a comedy blog...comedic?
Thank you! I thank you, my TinTin thanks you, and all of us at S,N! thank you!
Donald? Did you get the phone call yet? I'm guessing not since you were stupid enough to post yet again...but you ought to know that there are people you don't want paying attention to your blog, paying attention to your blog.
Oh, and I'm sure that Repsac here will be happy to provide all these comment threads with your threats to...well...whomever asks.
Nice fainting chair, Kevin.
I do have to laugh about one thing: When WorldNet Daily says they don't want a story, it's about time to question your sanity.
I visited Sadly No for the first time guys. To be up front, I thought my post about Donald the Buffalo Humping Moose was better.
Don's buddy Phillipe thought it was good also.
Have a good night and always practice safe sex Don.
Man, you go offline for a few hours to do some serious drinking and WTF.
Thanks Carl on the fainting couch. There was a red one that was really divine but not in my price range. For Don the this one would suffice.
And Donalde, I'm sorry to see that you're taking all this shit way too seriously.
And Reppy, I'm sorry to say that I'm not taking it seriously enough and that Donald is really a fucking asshole after all.
And Truth, where the heck have you been?
Well, Reppy, little slow on the responses, eh? I'm waiting. Three testimonies against you. Three million? Doesn't matter?
Carl: You're a loser? And a pussy. I'm laughing at you. That's comedy gold! You're a coward. Sadly No! is a cowardly blog. And actually, not comedy. Tragedy. And no one feels sorry for a sorry loser like you.
INVESTIGATION CONTINUES ... Lots more information coming down the pipeline. LOVIN' IT!!
Oh yes, Donald. LOTS of information :-)
I can almost hear you saying, "It's the big one, Elizabeth!"
Carl: You like this one better than this one? Comedy blog? Right.
The whole world is going to be laughing hard at these, no doubt. Should be a kick. Can't wait to get 'em on the docket with your name on them?
BIG SHMILE, Carl. BIG SHMILE!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
Carl: You like this one better than this one? Comedy blog? Right.
Chacon a on gout, Donalde!
Oh wait, that's French. That means to each according to his own taste.
And yes, those are damned funny to those of us who like to skewer asshats like yourself
After all, SASQUATCH ISREAL!
Come on, Donnie! You can do better than that. Hell, I'm funnier on my OWN blog than you are.
And it's "BEEG SHMILE," asshat
See? You can't even repeat a joke properly!
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!
'And it's "BEEG SHMILE," asshat
See? You can't even repeat a joke properly!
Awesome self-douche, Carl!! Just awesome. It was "Big SHMILE, Donalde! Big SHMILE!" when you first started in with the threats of litigation, idiot.
Having a hard time keepin' track of the web you're weaving, no, er, asshat?
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!
Awesome self-douche, Carl!! Just awesome. It was "Big SHMILE, Donalde! Big SHMILE!" when you first started in with the threats of litigation, idiot.
Poor Donalde. Poor deluded Donalde. See, this is why you don't get the "A" material.
Neither does your wife, apparently.
Or maybe she does? ;-) ;-)
Hey Donalde, haven't you asked yourself, if he's on the East Coast, why is CarlI up so late posting?
;-)
"Well, Reppy, little slow on the responses, eh? I'm waiting. Three testimonies against you. Three million? Doesn't matter?
Not quite sure what it is you're on about, Donalde, but I discussed your three testimonials in a comment at 9:05 pm. What I said was, while I'm sure they matter to you, no, they don't matter much to me, nor should they. For a particular opinion to matter, you have to know the person giving it, and have a history of either agreeing with or at least respecting their opinions in general. You seem to respect the opinions of the folks you're quoting, and that's great for you. I don't know or respect what they have to say in general, so their opinions of you mean little to me. That's just how it goes... I have a few folks that think kindly of me and think you, well, let's just say they think of you poorly. I wouldn't expect you to value their opinions, either... (But then, I also wouldn't waste my time or yours quoting them to you and asking you to respond to 'em, in the first place...)
I know it's probably pointless to mention, but I do have to point out that you're once again sounding a little crazy, Dr. Douglas... You prolly ought to calm down and think about what you're doing, and how it looks to others... All this woo hooing and bullshit is beneath you... You prolly ought to rethink your strategy, here... But of course, it is up to you, and I'll continue to play as long as you keep coming back for more..
You mean this 9:05 comment?
'I have no clue either way, but I'd guess that you'd have as much trouble with the folks you tried to sue as you believe they'd have trying to sue you.'
Actually, I think you're a little crazy, or just clueless. Well, both actually.
Yeah, that was the comment about your testimonials, Donalde. (Which makes one question why you squealed like a stuck polecat about your dang friends telling you how wonderful you are, when the comment was there all along.)
And what is it with you and the photos, today? Are you trying to prove something, or do you just think we don't know what we used to look like?
"Actually, I think you're a little crazy, or just clueless. Well, both actually."
See... You have opinions that nobody really cares about, too. Congratulations.
Give it up, man... You're clearly losing it... ...and I'm beginning to feel really sorry for you because of it.
'You're clearly losing it.'
Not.
You ignoring the points against your despicable evil doesn't count as "winning."
Besides, got you AND Carl pinned down, and LOVING IT!!!
Can you say deposition?
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!! WHOO HOO!!
And see, comments coming right through tonight ... YOU FREAKIN' LIAR!!!!!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!
This is one of those times where I'm going to be ignoring you, at least until you say something that makes some kinda sense to anyone aside you.
Have a good night, Donalde.
BWAAAHAHA.
I wake up and check American Nihilist to see if Don finally had something to read worth reading. As usual, his pathetic attempts at humor and threats have bored me once again.
I wonder if he gives extra credit to his students than stay awake during class.
I know what you mean Truth. I'm beginning to think these guys don't sleep.
Oh dear....did I step into the middle of yet another Donalde freak out?
You might think he would find some sort of....haven, right?
Wow. Nice weather you got here today! It's pouring rain back in the city.
I can not stop reading this. And 'so fresh, so full of information, I do not know. I'm glad that people actually write the smart way to show the different sides of him.
Este blog é uma representação exata de competências. Eu gosto da sua recomendação. Um grande conceito que reflete os pensamentos do escritor. Consultoria RH
The information you have on this blog is so good that I wouldn't mind paying to be able to access it. But could you please do something about the spam here. It prevents me from asking questions about the subject. Great resource, anyway. Shouldn't be complaining I guess. Lol
Post a Comment